• Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 hours ago

    A country or coalition that mastered Eurasia would become a global menace, for it would possess the power to make even the most distant democracies insecure. So, aspiring conquerors would lunge for Eurasian hegemony, while offshore powers — and the vulnerable states situated along Eurasia’s edges — would fight to preserve their freedoms by keeping the supercontinent divided.

    This passage is the crux of the article. Really telling what the intent of the author is with that last sentence. Yankees have always been nervous about the prospect of a united Asia/Europe, which is exactly what the “supercontinent” was heading towards before the Ukraine situation. Europe, Russia, India and China together posses industry, population and resources that absolutely dwarf what America possess.

  • CascadeOfLight [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    …the US should begin its response preparations

    Always on the defense, of course - just preparing for our pre-emptive retaliation. We have to be ready to respond in an instant, even before our opponent moves!

  • Guamer [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    World Wars Episode I: The Eurasian Menace

    Episode II: Attack of the Drones

    Episode III: Revenge of the BRICS

    Episode IV: A New Cope

    Episode V: The (American) Empire Strikes Back

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    These partnerships enabled democracy to thrive and the free-world economy to flourish, and they formed the foundation upon which the liberal world order was built. By the 1990s, the Western victory over the Soviet Union had inaugurated a post-Cold War era of great-power peace and democratic dominance.

    Fuck I hate liberals so much. Indonesia? Vietnam? Iran? Lebanon? The Cold War wasn’t won peacefully or democratically. 🙄

    U.S. military spending is nearly as low, as a percentage of gross domestic product, as it has been at any time since World War II.

    gfdi the US spends far more than any other country, fuck off fuck off fuck ooooofffff

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      11 hours ago

      U.S. military spending is nearly as low, as a percentage of gross domestic product, as it has been at any time since World War II.

      I love content where country-by-country comparisons must exist (ideally in infographic form) but the US is only compared to the US.

      • Enjoyer_of_Games [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        10 hours ago

        yeah but they are spending less than when they were last at total war and also before the CIA was formed starting the practice of obfuscating how much money is being funneled into defense.

  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The United States has a post-Cold War military in a pre-world war world. It should be devoting about 5 percent of GDP to defense — significantly more than its current 3 percent.

    • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Everyone knows the best way to defend yourself against widespread global cooperation is not to participate in that cooperation or give the world reasons to cooperate with you. No actually the best way is to just spend all of your money on bombs and bomb the entire world!

      Yes I am available as a government consultant. No I don’t care what party.

      • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Commander: Have we bombed anywhere? Have we shown 'em we got teeth?
        Carpenter: Oh yes, sir. We’ve bombed a lot of places flat, sir.
        Commander: Good. Good. We don’t want anyone to think we’re chicken.
        Carpenter: Oh no! They don’t think that, sir. Everyone’s really scared of us, sir.
        Commander: Of us?
        Carpenter: Yes, sir.
        Commander: (pleased) Of our power?
        Carpenter: Oh yes, sir! They’re really scared when they see those big planes come over.
        Commander: Wow! I bet they are. I bet they are. I bet they’re really scared.
        Carpenter: Oh they are, sir.
        Commander: Do we have any figures on how scared they are?
        Carpenter: No … no figures, sir. But they sure were scared.
        Commander: Ah! But it’s not working?
        Carpenter: No, sir.

    • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Of course they leave out any consideration for whether or not the US actually has the workers, soldiers or industry (it doesn’t) to make use of a whole extra 2% of its GDP on war. Literally the pentagon can’t even use all the money it already has (which is why money keeps disappearing and the pentagon keeps failing audits).

      • fox [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Finance capitalism says the more money the more better. Factories have a lower return than speculation on annual ammunition production

  • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    12 hours ago

    author is “Hal Brands”:

    Wikipedia

    Hal Brands (born 1983) is an American political scientist and scholar of U.S. foreign policy. He is the Henry A. Kissinger Distinguished Professor of Global Affairs at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) and a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.