Summary

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has launched the nationwide “Yes to Disarmament, Yes to Peace” program.

The program offers cash to citizens who anonymously surrender firearms, including $430 for revolvers, $1,200 for AK-47s, and $1,300 for machine guns.

The weapons will be destroyed.

The program, expanded from a 2019 Mexico City initiative, aims to combat violent crime, with firearms responsible for 70% of Mexico’s 31,062 homicides in 2023.

  • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Unfortunately so long as they border the US guns will be widely available. One of many reasons concerns about guns entering the US from Mexico are silly

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Unfortunately, you have to be a citizen to take advantage of the deal. That’s a huge paycheck for an AK though.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m pretty sure you could make a deal with a local. Only trouble is getting an AK47 over the boarder.

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just thinking about this a bit more now; in the world we live in, and considering the number of guns in the USA… if Mexico allowed for this program to go on for a while the USA could potentially inadvertently bankrupt the Mexican economy in gun-buybacks. It’s kinda funny in a scary as fuck way.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        You can manufacture them with a lathe and CnC machine, and thats if you want quality. There are some rather terrifying Sten and Grease gun “replicas” in my area which you shouldnt shoot under any circumstances because they were manufactured in a shed by a half crazed Redneck and/or veteran back in the 90s.

  • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Step 1. Buy ~$500 AR15

    Step 2. Sell said AR15 for $1300 to the government

    Step 3. Buy 2 ~$500 PSA AR15s

    Step 4. Sell them to the government for $2600

    Step11. Buy 32 ~$500 AR15s

    Step 12. Sell them to the government for $41600

    Step 25. Buy 16,384 ~$500 AR15s

    Step 26. Sell them to the government for $21.3M

    Step 39. Buy 2,097,152 ~$500 AR15s

    Step 40. Sell them to the government for $2.7B

    Continue until Mexico has run out of money

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Step 1. Buy ~$500 AR15

      From where?

      If you’re in Mexico it would make more sense as the seller to sell it for the $1300.

      If you’re in the states, are you going to travel to and smuggle to Mexico?

    • MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You always hear about these programs creating the wrong incentives. Soon enough, it’s easier to set up an AR15 factory and just start producing them so you can sell them to the government.

      Georgia had program to try to cut down on the number of wild hogs that were overpopulated. So, they paid people a price per tail. Soon enough, you had people breeding wild hogs, so they could kill them and get the bounty.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_machine_gun

      PSA: People only care about splitting hairs with these definitions because they don’t want guns to be banned. Learn to see it for what it is so you can better argue against it. This guy, for example, doesn’t actually care about what a machine gun is and only wants to muddy the waters so fewer weapons are banned.

    • Kimjongtooill@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The term is generally considered a firearm that can fire more than one shot with a single trigger pull. Its complicated and there is more nuance, especially if you are going by ATF definitions. But overall, that’s typically what they mean.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not going to be perfect, and unless you can stop the guns coming from the border it’s not a permanent solution, but maybe it can help a handful of struggling youngsters to stay out of gangs and crime rings.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      but maybe it can help a handful of struggling youngsters to stay out of gangs and crime rings.

      Nah. Mexico needs a cultural shift for that to happen.

      Too many of them revere gang violence, which is why it’s so prevalent in their society.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think Mexico should invest in building some kind of border wall to keep all of the harmful stuff from the U.S out. They could even make the U.S pay for it

    • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Brazil did something similar a couple decades ago and it helped reduce numbers of violent crimes to some extent. The numbers were constantly going up year after year and this iniative made it go down drastically, but it continued going up at the same rate as it did before. After a decade or so it was already at the same rate as it used to be before they got the guns - and it kept going further up since

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Interesting. Did the buyback offer eventually expire, or the buyback rates not increase? If either were the case, renewing it might continue to have benefits. Like I said, a good solution but not a permanent one.

  • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just like with US buybacks, they will get guns that would never be used in a homicide, unless it were stolen.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      And the same with other countries buybacks. The government gets sold a load of trashed/trashy guns, sellers get money for better guns.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      What?!

      You know guns last longer than people right?

      Even if never sold and never stolen, they will eventually be inherited.

      Like, you know great grandma didn’t really move to a farm upstate, right?

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        Are you saying that you believe that eventually the family heirloom gun will inevitably be passed down to a murderous Mexican?

        That’s pretty racist.

  • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    What’s the legal difference in Mexico between an AK and a machine gun? If the $1200 is for a semi AK, it’s only an extra $100 for a select fire one?

  • mastod0n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Would be too bad if there was one or more organisations in Mexico with the means to import arms from abroad to make big bucks with this. Bonus for using the money to fund illegal operations.

    • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Generally buyback programs are a success because they reduce the amount of guns.

      Sorry you would rather pretend in some made up situation that there is an infinite amount of guns and nothing can be done to stop the unlimited flow of guns.

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Gun violence in the USA increases every year. Buyback programs have been happening for how long, since the 60’s?

        Tell me more about how effective they are.

        Also, until the manufacturing of firearms is eliminated… yes, there is essentially an unlimited supply.

        To further compound the issue; the programs we’ve had in the US are voluntary. In the USA, there are more guns than people and firearms ownership is both engrained into the culture and a part of the constitution. In the hypothetical scenario that firearms manufacture were to be ended, and buy back programs were to become mandatory; which group of people are you going to task with rounding up all of the guns?

        It’s a complex problem; maybe you need a pedant to understand some of the complexities.

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Buyback programs were a piece of the Australian program; far from the whole thing. Requiring gun licenses and the creation of the firearms registry probably had more to do with it than the buyback programs.

        • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I didn’t ask for a pedant.

          Gun buyback programs remove guns from circulation which is inherently a good thing if you want gun violence to decrease.

          • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Well you got one because the tone that you use to speak with people lets them infer that you’re a complete asshole.

            Gun buyback programs on their own are incredibly expensive with almost no correlation to decreasing violence or gun crimes.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Buyback programs collect ancient, worthless and broken guns, funding people to buy better guns.

        Pictured: A bunch of crappy guns. Probably a shitload of antiques getting trashed because idiots, “Less means good!”

        Pro tip: Keep using “bootlicker”. It’s a simple burn that let’s everyone know you’re “right thinking” and the OP you replied to is a fascist. Gets lots up upvotes, makes you feel good.

        • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          Yeah because nobody would ever ever shoot someone with a stale gun.

          You are a dumb bootlicker. It means you suck the cocks of authoritarian strong men in absence of a real ideology.

          I hope one day you accidentally do mushrooms and discover self reflection.