• autumn@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Instances can defederate whenever they want, but skimming the sidebar and announcements, it’s weirder to me that lemmy.world is still federated with lemmygrad, which seems to be very similar to hexbear.

    Anyone have any insight into the difference between lemmygrad and hexbear?

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmygrad is marxist leninist

      Hexbear is leftist unity, larger, and more shitpostery. Also hexbear has more trans users because of even better moderation and pronoun tags being the default.

  • remkit@lemmy.kya.moe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You want to defederate from the largest Lemmy instance, the poster child, and the mascot of Lemmy? Good luck. They are Lemmy now.

      • remkit@lemmy.kya.moe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree, but it’s too late now. Even Sync defaults to the .world instance, and at this rate, they’ll only grow bigger.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah it won’t happen on its own, there would need to be a concentrated effort to oppose .world domination at this point.

          It won’t be a problem until .world starts demanding mutual defederation (i.e. instances federated with .world have to pledge to defederate from instances .world deems problematic)

  • kitonthenet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I googled this to find the drama and the first link is to their fucking cth community lol

    you don’t get to be edgelord shitposters and then complain when people don’t let you come over to kick their sandcastles down anymore

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree with lemmy.world’s decision, for three reasons:

    1. Address problems as they appear - negligence is bad, but so is jumping at the gun.
    2. Locking users out because they’re misbehaving is different than locking them out under the assumption that they’ll misbehave.
    3. Given that lemmy.world is a generic purpose instance, odds are that it would work better by letting users sort themselves out, and only intervene on problems when it is not reasonable to expect users to do so.

    I also think that lemmy.world’s current size in comparison with other instances is a bit problematic. It’s great to see instances growing but it would be better if said growth was spread out.

    Just my two cents, mind you. I’m from neither instance.

    • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a naked man outside a store, whippin’ his dong around & throwing poo at passersby…

      Do you have to let him the store just because he hasn’t actually done any of that stuff inside yet?

      Or can you preemptively decide he won’t be allowed inside?

      FWIW, I agree with everything you’ve said, just looking for clarification.

      • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the analogy would be more accurate if he was whipping his dong out and throwing shit within his own home. And he can do what he wants there, because it’s not affecting anyone else. Sure, the people in his house can have whatever opinions they want of him, but if he’s cleaned up and dressed before he leaves his house, who cares?