AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoAsimov missed somethinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square54linkfedilinkarrow-up11.18Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.17Karrow-down1imageAsimov missed somethinglemmy.worldAMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square54linkfedilink
minus-squareInternetCitizen2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41arrow-down1·3 months agoRobot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
minus-squareIoughttamow@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up28·3 months agoUnder the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort
minus-squareKlear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoGood start, but can we change that to “first resort”?
minus-squaremetaStatic@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·3 months agoA truly moral use case of the hanibal directive
minus-squareBlack616Angel@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoOkay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.
Robot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
Under the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort
Ohhh yes
Good start, but can we change that to “first resort”?
A truly moral use case of the hanibal directive
Okay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.