Trump’s administration is dismantling disability rights and education. History has shown this can be a warning sign for all civil liberties
Trump’s administration is dismantling disability rights and education. History has shown this can be a warning sign for all civil liberties
Don’t worry, I was assured by many Very Serious Leftists on here that nothing would change under a Trump presidency and that I was just fearmongering.
Tankies all
Some were just garden-variety idiots.
Not all idiots are tankies but…
Maybe that’s just me but I never saw anyone here say anything about that. I’m pretty sure most Very Serious Leftists will tell you that while nothing would change in Palestine, a lot would change in America.
Where Palestine goes, we all go.
Until everyone who really believes in freedom and liberty understands that, good luck out there.
Unfortunately, if you’re seriously interested, I can give you a long list of examples from pre-election arguments I had with people.
Wait what the shit? I wanna see that.
https://lemmy.world/comment/14674367
https://lemmy.world/post/12247352/7775795
https://lemmy.world/post/21302719/13116088
https://lemmy.world/post/21302719/13108379
https://lemmy.world/post/20205865/12584685
https://lemmy.world/post/20720227/12824714
https://lemmy.world/post/20720227/12824370
My blood pressure is rising looking back through them, and Lemmy.world having its first outages in two weeks isn’t helping me search, so I’ll leave it here.
Some of these are pretty insane, but some also make sense (especially without the benefit of hindsight). “Nobody is saved by electoral politics” for example is, well… that’s exactly what happened.
“Nobody is saved by electoral politics” pretty clearly implies “Nobody can be saved by electoral politics, by the nature of electoral politics in this society”, not “Nobody will be saved by electoral politics in this election, because I believe firmly in the inevitable victory of the immeasurably worse candidate to win by 2% of the vote”
As someone who’s been predicting Harris would lose since August, both are true. Also rather than “in this society” it’s “everywhere”. The way I like to put it is that electoral politics is only the victory lap; you go out and do activism work, build a base of support, spread your ideas, create a movement, negotiate with or (metaphorically or literally) come to blows with the establishment and finally ask people to vote for you or your ideas in the election. So with that in mind, nobody anywhere is saved by electoral politics alone because whether you win or lose in the election hinges on doing the actual hard work before and during campaign season. And if you want to ask “do I need to do all this when my idea is that I want to stop fascism”, the answer is I think quite demonstrably yes.
… not unless you think that the election of Harris would have resulted in the same scenario we’re facing now?
That’s generally not what people mean when they say ‘electoral politics’ though. When they say ‘electoral politics’, they are generally talking about the entirety of electoral politics, not just election day. “You will never destroy the master’s house with the master’s tools” is how they usually put it. They are not advocating for a more robust participation in bourgeois democracy, they are advocating for revolutionary action and, quite explicitly, the total rejection and nonparticipation in civic affairs under current government structures.
The non-insane version is ‘harm reduction’, wherein participation in bourgeois democracy is permissible so long as you don’t confuse it for an end goal or a primary means.