• musubibreakfast@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 天前

    That’s basically China with extra steps. How are you going to deal with your companies siphoning money out of your economy by buying foreign real estate?

    • Belgdore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 天前

      Corporations should be owned jointly in equal parts by the people who work there. Most live local and won’t want to do that.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 天前

        Ah there’s that glorious protectionism that just shot the global economy in the foot! Constitutional law is gone and you’re day dreaming about reforming business law lmaooooo CLASSIC.

        COMMUNIST REVOLUTION WEN?

        • Belgdore@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 天前

          This whole thread is about day dreaming about business law reform.

          The whole world doesn’t stop to deal with each problem individually.

    • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 天前

      Of course, it’s basically a communist idea from even before the Russian revolution.

      To answer your question: since corporations aren’t allowed to own more than the buildings they work with, they could not buy foreign real estate - except for facilities or offices they really use.

      I don’t think I know all the answers, it was just a interesting idea I read a while ago.

      As far as I know it was never implemented, so weather it would work out or not is just speculation.