Image is from the Britannica article on CECOT, known as the Terrorism Confinement Center in English.


This megathread’s topic is inspired by our lovely news regular, @Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net, who talks often about the conditions inside El Salvador and gives nuanced and informative takes.

As the Trump administration continues to make foreign policy blunders that would make even the staunchest anti-imperialist accelerationist blush - and we are barely three months in! - it’s interesting to compare and contrast his policies of incompetent imperialist and domestic management to the dictators in other countries.

Bukele is somewhat unique among fascists, in that he seems to not hide - and seems to even admit to - his evil, self-describing as the world’s “coolest dictator”. El Salvador has no particular shortage of prominent fascists in their history, but one major example is Maximiliano Martínez, who led the country over much of the 1930s and the early 1940s. He was responsible the deaths of many thousands of communists and indigneous people, and yet joined World War 2 on the side of the Allies and against the Nazis.

The comparisons between Martínez and Bukele - and, indeed, between Bukele and Trump - in terms of their impact on minority groups are slowly growing as world attention is being drawn to the country. The recent meeting between Bukele and Trump has shifted a spotlight onto El Salvador’s crime policy; the internal conditions of El Salvador’s prisons are genuinely monstrous. One gets a similar feeling as when reading descriptions of the conditions of Holocaust victims in German concentration camps. Trump has made statements to the effect that he want a similar crime crackdown inside the United States, and I certainly believe that he wants this (ICE is already just kidnapping people off the streets into vans), but his administration has been so chaotic and mismanaged that it’s difficult to determine whether this will be an interest he rapidly drops in favor of some other hair-brained scheme.


Last week’s thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Fishroot [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    26 minutes ago

    Sachs also refered Carney as “one of his best student”. I wonder how Carney is going to further “reform” Canada economically.

    Also, never let you guard down on someone Jeffrey Sachs roots for.

      • Fishroot [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        I’m actually curious if Carney can actually change the status quo of Canadian Economy by making it more integrated and more safe from external economy disruption. Fun fact, Canada has more trade barrier btw its provinces than each provinces have with the US.

        People voted for the libs this time because of liberal nationalism, but I know that we’ll fold soon and we are going to buy all the F35s from the US

  • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    51 minutes ago

    US airstrikes continued on Yemen for the 45th night, and 46th day, in a row.

    Nighttime airstrikes hit the following governorates:

    Sana’a

    • Multiple airstrikes on Bilad Ar Rus district.
    • 4 airstrikes on Jabal Nuqum.
    • Multiple rounds of airstrikes on various areas of the capital itself, US Navy fighter jets were heard over Sana’a.

    Amran

    • 3 airstrikes on Harf Sufyan district.

    Saada

    • An airstrike on Sahar District.

    Dhamar

    • airstrike hit unknown area.

    Daytime airstrikes hit the following governorates:

    Al Jawf

    • 6 airstrikes on Bart Al-Anan District.

    Ta’izz

    • 4 airstrikes on Maqbanah District.

    Warning for potential graphic imagery during ongoing airstrikes:

    Al Masirah TV twitter

    Xcancel mirror

  • UnitedNations [it/its]@hexbear.netB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    “I wished for death to end the nightmare I was living through”.

    Received this awful testimony from a colleague who was rounded up in Gaza tortured while in Israeli detention and finally released.

    For UNRWA staff humanitarian duty is met with brutality.

    Since the start of the war in October 2023, over 50 UNRWA staff among them teachers, doctors, social workers, have been detained and abused.

    They have been treated in the most shocking and inhumane way. They reported being beaten up and used as human shields.

    They were subjected to sleep deprivation, humiliation, threats of harm to them and their families and attacks by dogs.

    Many were subjected to forced confessions.

    Philippe Lazzarini, UNRWA Commissioner-General

    • Lemister [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      BTW Israhell has been blocking UN food relief, so basically Gaza has run out of food. You would think this organization would protect its own employees at least. But no, the “international law” gang loves to pounce on AES and do nothing that for example North Korea isnt allowed to import agricultural machinery to improve its food population.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Neat infographic showing US/Coalition air losses to AnsarAllah since 2015, updated for the recent FA-18 loss.

    Note this includes indirect losses such as the one from yesterday and aircraft written off due to technical failures whilst engaging AnsarAllah.

  • UnitedNations [it/its]@hexbear.netB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Despite knowing the gravity of the crises, the Council’s inaction itself is “an indictment”, said Filippo Grandi, UN High Commissioner for Refugees, asserting that the organ has “chronically failed to live up to” its responsibility.


    Meeting coverage SC/16051 from yesterdays 9905th meeting of the United Nations Security Council.
    Verbatim records to be issued as document S/PV.9905 | Web TV video recording.

    ‘You Are Undermining Your Own Stability’, High Commissioner for Refugees Tells Security Council, Warning against Retrenching from Aid, Multilateralism [partial quote]

    In what he described as possibly his last address to the Security Council, the head of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) warned today that “violence has become the defining currency of our age” — from Sudan to Ukraine, from the Sahel to Myanmar and beyond — and urged the 15-member organ to fulfil its responsibility for maintaining peace.

    Despite knowing the gravity of the crises, the Council’s inaction itself is “an indictment”, said Filippo Grandi, UN High Commissioner for Refugees, asserting that the organ has “chronically failed to live up to” its responsibility.

    He painted a bleak picture of today’s wars, driven by the “perverse, yet powerful delusion: that peace is for the weak”, where victory is pursued not through negotiation but by inflicting unbearable suffering. As a result, “the norms of international humanitarian law… are cast aside, dismissed as easily as the thousands of lives destroyed in the pursuit of supremacy”. Quoting Pope Francis, he reminded members that “every war represents not only a defeat of politics but also a shameful surrender”.

    Highlighting the plight of 123 million forcibly displaced people worldwide, he described their hope for safety and eventual return, noting especially the devastating situation in Sudan, where “one out of every three people” has been displaced. Refugee-receiving countries are doing their part. “You must be more committed and more united to do yours,” he urged.

    On Ukraine, he emphasized the need for a “just peace” that would allow more than 10 million displaced Ukrainians to return safely, cautioning that “solutions are hard work” requiring “commitment and compromise”. In Myanmar, he urged breaking eight years of “dangerous inertia” concerning the Rohingya crisis, stressing that while challenges are immense, dialogue with all parties is “a critical first step” towards creating conditions for the safe, voluntary and dignified return of refugees. “It is a long shot, for sure”, he admitted, but insisted that stagnation is no longer an option, urging the Council to sustain its robust focus on the situation in Myanmar.

    Referencing the symbolic moment of the new Syrian flag being raised at the UN on 25 April, he said: “For the first time in decades, there is a spark of hope, including for the millions of Syrians who remain displaced today, 4.5 million of them refugees in neighbouring countries.” But achieving lasting solutions will require prioritizing the Syrian people over “long-standing politics, some of which are frankly outdated”.

    Finally, he warned against the global trend of retrenching from aid and multilateralism at a critical time for several displacement crises. “Aid is stability,” he declared, noting that by freezing or cutting aid budgets — which means taking support away from very fragile host countries and abandoning displaced people to their fate — “you are undermining your own stability”.

    In the discussion that followed, some members warned of the global trend of aid cuts, while others called for more equal burden-sharing.

    China’s delegate emphasized that “solving the refugee problem requires strengthening international cooperation”. However, a certain country has drastically cut foreign aid, forcing many humanitarian organizations to reduce their aid activities. “This is undoubtedly a serious blow to refugee relief,” he said, warning that more people would be displaced. He called on developed countries to shoulder their responsibilities by fulfilling their aid commitments and providing more support to refugee-hosting countries and multilateral humanitarian organizations. He also warned against unilateralism and “hegemonic and bullying” behaviour.

    The representative of the United States said that “the UN exists for collective action, and collective action demands collective responsibility”. Underscoring the responsibility for every Member State to share the burden of humanitarian response to conflict, she said that “the United States has disproportionately shouldered this burden for decades”.

    The representative of the Russian Federation said that Western countries, “who have provoked a lion’s share of conflict throughout the world”, are very reluctant to finance UNHCR’s programmes to assist refugees from Syria, Afghanistan, Sudan and many other conflict-ridden countries.

    Pakistan’s delegate, noting that his country has provided shelter, protection and opportunities to millions of Afghans, expressed concern that developing countries — many grappling with their own socioeconomic challenges — continue to shoulder the greatest burden. Meanwhile, developed nations, despite their far greater resources and moral obligations, have increasingly turned inward. “Physical and political barriers have been erected, closing doors to those most in need,” he said.

    Several speakers highlighted other factors causing mass displacement, with Guyana’s delegate stating that climate change is also becoming a major driver of such movement. Citing the 2024 global data over the past decade, she said that weather-related disasters have caused 220 million people to be internally displaced. Slovenia’s representative added: “Climate-fuelled floods, fires and prolonged droughts now drive families from their homes as ruthlessly as any gunman or bombs.”

    Citing Sudanese women fleeing to Chad, Congolese women in displacement camps around Goma, and Rohingya women and girls in long-term refugee camps in Bangladesh, Sierra Leone’s delegate said that climate-induced disasters further compound their vulnerability and increase the severity of such violence.

    Responding to comments and questions by Council members, Mr. Grandi said that “I am leading an internal effort, which may conclude with the retrenchment of my organization to up to one third of its capacity.” There will be fewer offices, fewer programmes and fewer operations, he added, noting that UNHCR — founded in 1950 — will “unfortunately” observe its seventy-fifth anniversary in 2025. “It is not a date to celebrate, but one perhaps on which to reflect on the challenges that we all face, and to try and find some inspiration to address them together,” he concluded.

  • Yllych [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Jagmeet Singh, leader of the federal NDP in Canada, has officially conceded defeat in his riding which has been taken by the Liberals.

    The NDP itself is also losing official party status as they were unable to gain 12 or more seats, and will be unable to access certain funds and lose special parliamentary privileges.

    Since their high water mark of being the Official Opposition after the 2011 election under Jack Layton, the NDP has triangulated itself to what we see today: a party that refused to leave the shadow of the Liberals.

    • CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Considering the Liberals are less than seven seats shy of a majority, the NDP have quite a bit of power still - Libs have to turn to them or the Bloc to pass any policy, and especially so for any that requires confidence of the house or it will trigger an election.

      It’s effectively the same parliamentary calculus as before the election, except now the NDP have far less presence on committees and we pretty much lost anyone who cared about Palestine.

      • carpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        lost anyone who cared about Palestine.

        through this campaign jagmeet started saying correct things about gaza, explicitly using the word genocide. he hasn’t been correct on this for long but he’s literally the only canadian party leader who has been. elizabeth may of the GPC continued just blaming netanyahu. to be clear, I don’t give jagmeet a lot of credit here, but I note the change of rhetoric nevertheless.

        as far as their power in a minority government, I think they’re really going to be pressed to maintain party discipline to force the libs to do anything specific. 7 seats, collapsed federal vote, no leader and no official party status will not make it easier for them to extract concessions from the LPC. it’ll be curious to see who the LPC turns to to get anything done - the BQ, NDP and elizabeth May are all options and they only need 4 or 5 votes to pass measures with a majority

  • very_poggers_gay [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Maybe I’m missing discussion about the Canadian federal election, but the Libs have won again.

    At least the conservatives were kept from winning, but support for the NDP (the party to the left of the libs) is way down.

    • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The inevitable result of FPTP voting, tbh. What were the NDP’s stances relative to the Libs, were they trying to actually reasonably differentiate themselves by being further left or are they triangulating themselves into irrelevance? IIRC Mulcair swung hard to center and I don’t recall hearing if Singh changed that at all.

      • Fishroot [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        IIRC Mulcair swung hard to center and I don’t recall hearing if Singh changed that at all.

        I met Mulcair in my university he used to teach polsci. He said that Tony Blair is his dear friend and inspiration.

      • someone [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 hours ago

        My feelings on Mulcair are complicated. Policy-wise he was bland. But my god he was a pitbull in question period, he actually did a good job in focusing media attention on then-PM Harper’s BS.

      • very_poggers_gay [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        10 hours ago

        it’s honestly hard for me to say, because they’ve allowed themselves to fade into the background in the last few months. They’ve lost something like 30-50% of their support compared to the last election. Part of that is definitely strategic voting in our rotten voting system (e.g., genuine NDP/Green supporters casting votes for Liberals to keep Conservatives from winning), but they’ve also made it really easy just to forget about them, likely losing them genuine support and failing to connect with potential supporters.

        I think they’re more comfortable nagging liberals to do marginally better for the working class than fighting for real power to make bigger changes.

        • Fishroot [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The fact that the NDP is a junior partner to the liberal didn’t help their case, no one is going to give you credit for the dental insurance for low income citizens when the liberals are the one that allows it to pass.

          but looking at the results liberals cannibalizing NDP’s votes is pretty obvious

      • EnsignRedshirt [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Singh was just another pivot to the center. He was supposed to be the answer to Justin Trudeau, in that he embodies vaguely progressive aesthetics with no substance. He should absolutely have resigned after the last election. He got elected in 2019 having lost like 15 seats, then failed to manifest any gains in the following election.

        That would have been a perfect time to bow out and allow for a robust leadership contest and a chance for some renewed enthusiasm for the party going up against an unpopular incumbent and a differently unpopular opposition. The fact that Trudeau resigned and Singh didn’t is damning. I’m so glad he lost his own riding.

        I wonder if the NDP realizes at this point that they can’t win the triangulation war. They had years of real leverage over the government and they got neither policy gains nor political gains to show for it. They have a great opportunity to reinvent themselves as a legitimate alternative to the two default parties, and I look forward to seeing how they manage to fuck it up for themselves.

          • EnsignRedshirt [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 minutes ago

            Getting a couple policy wins is tablestakes when you’re in a literal supply and confidence agreement. They appeared to do very little to use their position to make noise or twist the knife on the government.

            That’s just armchair quarterbacking from me, though. The real tragedy was the loss of seats. They had the opportunity to be an alternative as the Liberals lost popularity, and they were losing disaffected voters to the Conservatives doing bad Trump cosplay. Completely unforgivable performance, and should by now prove that the NDP has no future trying to appeal to the center. They could carve out a substantial position for themselves by staking out firmer, clearer positions on socdem policies, but they seem allergic to that idea. I’m guessing they believe that if they’re not taking a straight line path to forming government then they’re not being serious, a deeply unserious position.

        • someone [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I can see floor-crossing happening if it would put the Liberals into a majority.

          I’m wondering if Carney is going to push for proportional representation. It would prevent a Liberal majority ever again, but it would also deny the Conservatives a majority ever again. Carney may gamble on the latter being worth the cost of the former if it keeps Canada independent.

          • carpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.netM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I sincerely doubt carney will push for some kind of proportional representation. I mean maybe, but the two big parties really benefit from devolution to 2 parties under FPTP. it makes the ‘sword and shield of capital’ model of democracy that much easier.

          • Fishroot [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            52 minutes ago

            I’m wondering if Carney is going to push for proportional representation.

            no he won’t.

            He also proposed to build 500k social housing unit, so he’ll probably sweep it under the rug in the following month

          • FALGSConaut [comrade/them]@hexbear.netM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It’d surprise me if libs decided to actually do voting reform. That was their big promise when Trudeau was first elected, but they’re the ones that benefit the most from FPTP so they decided to drop it and never mention it again

  • Socialism_Is_The_Alternative [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I’ve now seen some of the first officially released footage of DPRK troops training and fighting together with Russian forces.

    Russian and DPRK soldiers embrace after liberating a Kursk oblast settlement: https://news-pravda.com/world/2025/04/28/1278139.html

    The training of DPRK troops that participated in liberating the Kursk oblast border areas: https://news-pravda.com/world/2025/04/28/1278340.html

    President Putin also thanked the DPRK for its military assistance, stating, “We pay tribute to the courage and selflessness of the Korean warriors who stood side by side with the Russian Armed Forces to defend our homeland as if it were their own.

    Our Korean friends acted out of a sense of solidarity, justice, and true comradeship. We highly appreciate this and are sincerely grateful to the Chairman of State Affairs, Comrade Kim Jong-un, the entire leadership, and the people of North Korea.” https://sputnikglobe.com/20250428/putin-thanks-north-korea-for-helping-to-defeat-ukrainian-militants-in-kursk-region-1121945378.html

    Plus, some bonus videos…

    A Kiev regime Su-27 crashed while attempting to attack Russian Geran-2 drones today: https://news-pravda.com/world/2025/04/28/1279097.html

    Russian drones struck a Kiev regime airfield near Cherkassy: https://s5.cdnstatic.space/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/chrk.mp4?_=1

  • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    hey newsheads, question— not that I give a shit about the ritual minutiae of our liberal “democracy”, but why does the president have complete uniliateral authority to determine tariffs? seems like something the legislature should be doing. I remember hearing someone say it was because of some bullshit national “emergency” execption because of some made-up shit involving fentanyl or whatever?

    • EnsignRedshirt [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The Onion’s “no one will stop me” loophole joke is just real real now. All the checks against presidential power are based on someone having to use discretion to enforce the law, and no one is willing to set the precedent that laws apply to the executive branch. It’s not worth hurting the power of the office just to deal with one oaf who still agrees with the status quo on a very fundamental level. Trump isn’t a revolutionary; this is pure infighting among the elites.

      This whole thing is a gigantic display of that observation about how conservatism boils down to having an in-group protected but not bound by the law, and an out-group bound but not protected by the law. Laws are for poor people, and Trump is not an exception.

      • CTHlurker [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        8 hours ago

        To add to your last paragraph, you shouldn’t underestimate just how much the current crop of republican reps. derive their power from being near Trump. Like, obviously the house reps are all ghouls, but it seems like a solid chunk of them now just consider themselves Trumpists primarily, and anything going against trump is considered political suicide to such an extent that nobody wants to go first.

    • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      yeah he’s declaring use of the international emergency economic powers act of 1977, so theoretically a congressional resolution can just put a stop to it and say the emergency is over or they’ve decided to revoke their delegation of authority. apparently trump is the first to use this act to impose tariffs, so the senate parliamentarian was caught completely off guard and has to dig through decades of legal documents before anything like that could happen.

        • CTHlurker [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 hours ago

          You don’t even need to revoke the entire law. Just pass a resolution saying that the crisis that Trump uses as a legal basis is over (or that he made it up), which should theoretically dissolve his legal ability to enforce the tariffs. Of course, this is speaking from a lawyer POV, which trump has shown the correct amount of respect for until now (none).

        • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.netM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          14 hours ago

          i’m sure if the parliamentarian weren’t such an obstinate bastard, they could come up with some creative way to revise it so that trump can’t whipsaw tariffs via twitter decree while maintaining the ability to impose sanctions.

          but alas kitty-birthday-sad