The DNC cited a procedural concern, but Hogg said it is “impossible to ignore the broader context” of his criticisms.

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I think you should still vote just to show you’re an active voter that they failed to court, but vote for independents, 3rd party, write in, whatever.

    Honestly, I think the only solution for progressives is to elect enough independents that mathematically, while a minority, MUST be courted by the establishment parties in order to secure their legislation. Though that won’t do anything for legislation that both establishment parties fully agree on, that’ll still get rammed through.

    But what are we even talking about? These are all legal constructs. We’re living post rule of law now. Dictator just flat ignoring courts.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah, that’s basically the situation in Australia. The crossbench is needed to pass anything in the Senate, but Liberals and Labour routinely join forces to pass some truly disgusting shit (most recently an election reform that would reduce funding to the smaller parties, and a takeover of one of the biggest unions in the country).