kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoJava at 30: How a language designed for a failed gadget became a global powerhousewww.zdnet.comexternal-linkmessage-square124linkfedilinkarrow-up1372arrow-down115cross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
arrow-up1357arrow-down1external-linkJava at 30: How a language designed for a failed gadget became a global powerhousewww.zdnet.comkirk781@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square124linkfedilinkcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoOOP makes so much sense. What happened?
minus-squareAnti-Antidote@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·2 months agoThe AbstractionBubbleFactory popped
minus-squaremagic_lobster_party@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoAbstractionBubbleBuilderFactoryStrategyImplementation mind you
minus-squarejenesaisquoi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoMany people increasingly find that using functional patterns enables them to build more reliable software.
minus-squaremagic_lobster_party@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoI don’t think OOP is as bad as many people make it out to be. It’s perfectly fine in moderation. The problem is that it can lead to over engineered applications when abused.
OOP makes so much sense. What happened?
The AbstractionBubbleFactory popped
AbstractionBubbleBuilderFactoryStrategyImplementation mind you
Many people increasingly find that using functional patterns enables them to build more reliable software.
I don’t think OOP is as bad as many people make it out to be. It’s perfectly fine in moderation.
The problem is that it can lead to over engineered applications when abused.