Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,” declare G7 leaders in a joint statement.

The leaders of the G7 countries on Monday issued a joint statement saying Iran should not have nuclear weapons and affirming Israel’s right to defend itself.

“Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon,” declared the statement, issued by the leaders of the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Canada and Japan, along with the EU.

They pledged to “remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability.”

  • dinren@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The Germans would have beat us to the bomb and used it and we would all be Nazis.

    What if the bomb just wasn’t possible? WWII would have lasted a lot longer, but the allies were going to win eventually at that point. There would not have been a Cold War (at least not one influenced by an arms race)

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Germany pretty concretely abandoned their ambitions for an atomic bomb towards the end of the war. If I remember correctly they came to the (incorrect) conclusion that the amount of uranium they would need is completely unfeasible

    • tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Germany was miles off, they lost the war before the first bomb was dropped, 7th May vs. 6th August. Its impossible for them to be both behind the Allied effort to make a nuclear bomb (so would have not been read to drop one until after 6th August) and still make one after they surrendered.

      The Allies very much lied to the scientists about how far along the Germans were to guilt them into making one against objections raised at the time.

      Now if those defecting Nazis who joined NASA and the like post war would have instead been used to replace objecting Allied scientists in the nuclear program, thats a real possibility.

      • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        There’s no real way of knowing what would have happened, but knowledge is eventually gained. Somebody would have developed nukes even if it tool a lot longer and we’d end up being in a similar situation eventually.

        • turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Knowledge is eventually gained, someone would have built practical devices relating to nuclear fission, whether that was a bomb or a reactor.

          Nazi Germany would not have done that in any time frame relevant to WWII. They specifically rejected aspects of atomic/quantum theory because they were tainted by “jewish science” which unknowingly set them back decades and sent them in the wrong direction. As much as they were obsessed with super weapons, they were very unscientific in their R&D.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      This illustrates exactly why we, as a species, are fucking doomed. If some on can do something that gives them a competitive edge, then someone will do it. Those who opt out are left behind.

      It’s why we can’t stop fossil fuels. Whoever stops using them will be at a competitive disadvantage. It’s why we can’t just leave AI on the shelf.

      • dinren@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yes the smarter we get, the better we get at destroying ourselves. Ridiculous.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Well, the Germans wouldn’t have because they got defeated long before the Manhattan Project produced a usable weapon. Their own attempt at it failed. Some suspect that Heisenberg actually did sabotage the German project, though it’s also possible that he was just bad at it.

      But the Soviet Union would have done it later on. Or any of a variety of other countries that probably shouldn’t be the first or only countries to have nuclear weapons. Science is not unique to the discoverer, other people can independently discover the same things.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      either that, or nukes would be used first in korean war instead. imo it’s a good thing that nukes were first used against the most cartoonishly evil fascist state imaginable at that point

            • Rolder@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              The Japanese at the time were, at the least, very close in terms of evilness. What with the crazy human experiments, execution of prisoners, and everything they did to the Chinese.

              This obviously does not reflect on modern day Japan.