floofloof@lemmy.ca to Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agoThe Switch 2's super sluggish LCD screen is 10 times slower than a typical gaming monitor and 100 times slower than an OLED panel according to independent testingwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up1115arrow-down18cross-posted to: technology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1107arrow-down1external-linkThe Switch 2's super sluggish LCD screen is 10 times slower than a typical gaming monitor and 100 times slower than an OLED panel according to independent testingwww.pcgamer.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square26linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmit.online
minus-squareB1ackmath@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down3·6 days agoIt’s also terrible compared to the first switch’s screen though.
minus-square.Donuts@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-26 days agoYeah it’s not good, it’s just a weird thing to put in the headline. It’s like comparing a new hatchback with its competition, but then also say it’s slower than the newest Ferrari. I think that should be a given as it’s a fraction of the price
minus-squareysjet@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down3·6 days agoExcept other testers found it to be ~4ms faster than the switch 1, in tests where they actually give their methodology. Monitors unboxed just went “yeah it’s 30+ms, source: trust me bro”
It’s also terrible compared to the first switch’s screen though.
Yeah it’s not good, it’s just a weird thing to put in the headline. It’s like comparing a new hatchback with its competition, but then also say it’s slower than the newest Ferrari. I think that should be a given as it’s a fraction of the price
Except other testers found it to be ~4ms faster than the switch 1, in tests where they actually give their methodology.
Monitors unboxed just went “yeah it’s 30+ms, source: trust me bro”