Image is of the Freedom Band performing at the end of the Second National Congress of the Socialist Movement of Ghana, sourced from this article. The same article contains most of the information used in the preamble below.
A little over a week ago, the Socialist Movement of Ghana concluded its second National Delegates Congress in Aburi, gathering 300 delegates from across the country. There, they deepened their commitment to the working class of Ghana and committed to intensifying political education and organization at the grassroots. The SMG itself decided to not electorally contest the 2024 elections in Ghana, but still presented a manifesto, and nonetheless managed to get two SMG members parliamentary seats in the National Democratic Congress.
Anyway, back to the National Delegates Congress: the delegates agreed that the Western imperialist system is now under a profound crisis, in which the likely future is a heightening of brutality, chaos, and resource plundering - a future which must be resisted and organized against.
To summarize their various statements and condemnations:
- Inside Ghana: a commitment to women’s rights, youth empowerment, and environmental protection.
- A condemnation of the resource plundering of the Democratic Republic of the Congo by imperialist powers.
- A salute to the people of Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso, in their campaign against outside imperial control in the Sahel.
- A condemnation of Morocco’s illegal occupation of the Western Sahara, and a call for the UN to identify the independence of the Sahwari people.
- A strong condemnation of Israel’s genocidal atrocities and massive terrorist operations against nearby countries, and support for Palestinian independence.
- Support for the people of Haiti against outside imperial domination.
- A call for the end of the blockade on Cuba and their removal from the State Sponsors of Terrorism list.
- Solidarity with Maduro and the people of Venezuela against the United States.
- A rejection of all imperialist aggression and sanctions against Iran.
- A condemnation of NATO’s decades-long military expansion eastwards towards Russia, especially as it has now resulted in massive devastation and risks a third world war.
- And finally, a commitment to Pan Africanism and international solidarity with all oppressed peoples around the world.
A platform I think we all can agree to!
Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.
Please check out the RedAtlas!
The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.
The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
It is no coincidence that after the defeat in Vietnam War, the empire began to fade as an industrial superpower. Betting on the wrong side of the Oil Crisis further resulted in the decay of American industrial capitalism with a rising Japan (the OG China) that soundly defeated America in manufacturing, infrastructure building, high-tech industries, automation, and even the financial and real estate sector itself (the GDP of Japan’s Imperial Palace alone was greater than the entire state of California by the late 1980s at the peak of the bubble).
However, as history has clearly shown, the empire did not go down with the defeat in Vietnam and the ending of Bretton Woods. It did not go down with the oil crisis in the 1970s. It did not go down with being overtaken by Japan in nearly almost every aspect (except for military).
Instead, the empire leaped into finance capitalism, as the dissolution of the USSR in the 1990s enabled the plundering of wealth at such unprecedented scale that it created the material conditions for the empire’s leap into a hyper-financialized economy (and even fueled the dot com bubble in the early 2000s), leaving behind its own contradictions while generating new ones in the process.
For the first time in history, the world’s hegemonic superpower is the debtor, not the creditor of the world. It leverages its vast consumer market to shape global economy by running persistent trade deficits, effectively allowing the endless extraction of surplus values from the labor and resources of the Global South, while the latter countries accumulated their freely printed IOUs in exchange.
It no longer exerts its influence through the use of its military strengths (the last time the US military had a proper show of force was the 1991 Gulf War, immediately before the end of the USSR) or industrial power, but through financial and monetary imperialism, sprinkling in regime change, terrorism and political chaos in the periphery (e.g. the Balkan conflicts immediate after the EU was formed in the 1990s).
It would be a grave mistake to think that the American empire will go down with neoliberalism. If anything, it is the BRICS countries that are clinging on to neoliberal free trade status quo (explicitly demanded by export led growth strategy) and accuse the US the hypocrisy of protectionism (fair point, but still defending the neoliberal status quo instead of racing ahead of the US to transition into socialism).
Once again, it is the US empire that is taking the initiative to leap out of the sinking neoliberal capitalism, into a new but unknown stage of capitalism.
We do not know what the end result will look like, nor do we know if this will end up helping or damaging the American empire, but it is a fact that they are the ones currently taking the initiative to actively reshape the global economy while the rest of the world still clings on to the status quo (a truly missed opportunity after the Ukraine war opened up for a radical change, for once). Those who think that the empire will just crumble by itself without exerting widespread damage to the rest of the world, and that the periphery can simply do nothing and win, are going to be sorely disappointed.
As you already noticed from what is happening over the past few years, the Ukraine war and Nord Stream bombing have ended the EU rise as a consumer market (once predicted to overtake the US by the 2020s), while Covid (by luck or by design) had decimated China’s consumption market. This gives the leverage firmly to the hands of the US, for they get to dictate how the global economy and the supply chain are going to be shaped. The fact that no major country is doing anything to stop an active genocide supported by the US empire tells you as much. Trump’s actions are madness, but so were Nixon’s.
What we can do as Marxists is to study, study, study, as Lenin said, study the theory more, further develop from the existing theory, in hopes to understand the dynamic changes of global capitalism, and hopefully armed with this new found knowledge, we can develop a strategy to defeat it. If our current model cannot explain what’s going on, then we will continue to get surprised by how they got away with it while we face certain defeat.
I’ll believe it when I see it. So far they’re constantly losing their grip and the financial mechanisms don’t contend with the real economy. They’re a smaller portion of trade, industry, and finance every day. You need to focus on what’s actually being made where. Trump’s actions aren’t madness, they’re restrained by reality. The US just don’t got the juice, and unless they cook up some new mechanism for reversing the declining rate of profit now that neoliberalism’s been squeezed dry, and I see nothing coming down the pipe, then they’re doomed to continual (but porbably bloody) decline. Who do they have to loot like they did the destroyed socialist bloc? Their margins from Chinese manufacturing are getting worse all the time. So they’ll loot Europe, but that’s cannibalism and will only weaken them in the long run.
Could they innovate that solution? Maybe, but the nature of these is each one is briefer and brittler than the one before.
Sorry, just added a sentence before seeing your response: The fact that no major country is doing anything to stop an active genocide supported by the US empire tells you as much.
The US is still capable of killing, yes. But it’s not capable of securing power, at least at a global scale. It can kill hundreds of thousands to lock down one region for a short time, but ultimately it renders that grip brittle. And it’s by no means unprecedented. The US killed comparable numbers or far greater all throughout the Cold War at far higher frequency. It always took years and years of popular movements and local resistance to bring those to an end. Killing is not an expression of stable power and it produces the conditions for its own defeat.
I have some other thoughts on the trade subject I want to respond with but I need some time to pull the data and write them out.
That’s the point. There is no longer a USSR that used to seriously oppose the US on the geopolitical stage. It does what it wants.
If the US is “weak” as you said, do you seriously think BRICS with over 40% global GDP and 40% of the world’s population can’t just tell the US and say: look, we’re going to have a problem with you if the genocide continues, and we’re going to leverage the mass of our combined economy to force you to at least negotiate for a ceasefire solution.
Well, turns out they can’t do anything, can they?
That’s not what I said. I said it is weaker than it has been in a long time.
As you correctly point out, BRICS has the strength to do that. Will they? Obviously not; that’s not at all what BRICS is for, how it operates, or what it wants to accomplish. I’ve never said anything remotely like “BRICS will save the day and crush the US”. I don’t think BRICS or China is going to be a global superhero. They’re just constructing an economic reality that increases their relative economic strength, which is one part of an inexorable economic trend towards the US shifting away from the center of the gonna economy. You’re either completely misunderstanding or completely misrepresenting me. And you seem to be contradicting yourself:
Are they incapable or unwilling?