• AF_R [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      You could mess around trying to exclude big tech like some wacky S&P 500 ex-tech fund or try to overweight small and mid cap. That’s if you absolutely must hold US though.

      For me about 70% of my portfolio is a world index with overweight on international. 60% VTI + 40% VXUS or equivalents. This is considered overexposure to international by conventional US investors.

      The other 30% is all-in on China via MCHI. I’m edging towards increasing international and China exposure and reducing US. The US large caps are fundamentally overvalued so I’ll probably do this soon. Just hard to make that mental jump even though the material analysis says so.

      To be clear, this is a risky strategy. All the major players and investors worldwide are adamant there is no AI bubble, and no US bubble, and China will never pay off or grow.

      It’s just about what you’re willing to risk to say you’re right and they’re wrong. Safest choice is VT and chill.

      • KuroXppi [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 minute ago

        Ty o7 my super is through a super fund so I can only set broad categories by exclusion (‘green’) or postures (conservative/balanced/aggressive). I’ll read up on each and see what I can do