• Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    So far, no one has ever been killed by a meteorite. There’s been a scary injury, some unconfirmed rumors and at least one engine block was cracked in half.

    That said, death by thing falling from space is totally how I want to die. Bonus points if I’m totally disintegrated and just MIA. ( Circuitboard. It was man made. Has anyone seen Uriel? ) A falling satellite will be fine.

  • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    This article was either written by AI, or a human with an IQ of 50

  • yojimbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Wow, I’ve never heard about “GIZCHINA”. It definitely isn’t gizmodo - right? 🤔 Right!

    • it is a Czech company with entire capital stock consisting of 4USD 😎 (cca 100 CZK)
    • the text is showing hight probability of AI generation. Which adult human being is going to write eg: " In this article, we will discuss the FAA report in detail, including the risks posed by falling satellites, the causes of these risks, and the potential solutions to mitigate them." 🤖
    • it does not say anything else than this - much more likely human written thing here - only the original is only 1/3 as long. That is IMO how come the AI Writing is literraly jumping out on you from the article. 😱

    This is my least favourite century yet.

  • Anduin1357@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Absolutely debunked, FAA accepted a report that didn’t do proper research and have been called out by SpaceX for it.

      • lte678@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Who wouldn’t? They are doing some of the most advanced rocket science on the planet. Of course, trusting corporations statements and research is an entire topic of it’s own. Taking Elon Musk seriously on the other hand…

        • ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Because they are a corporation that is actively littering LEO with hundreds of satellites, and fear economic retribution and/or responsibility as a consequence of this kind of information?

          You see how there might be something called “conflict of interest?”

          Having a conflict of interest does not mean they aren’t competent at what they do - just that they have reason to be biased against information that may result in direct consequence.

          • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            While SpaceX does launch and operate thousands of satellites, this also means that they stand to lose the most if LEO becomes cluttered with space junk. If anyone ought to be worried about space junk, it is the launch providers. If space junk becomes a problem, their customer base vanishes.

  • db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Injure? Injure?? If someone gets nothing but a boo boo from a falling fucking satellite then they need to go buy a lottery ticket right away.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Satellites will have thoroughly fragmented by the time they reach the ground, you’d be hit by a piece of a satellite.

      Assuming the study being referenced wasn’t actually badly flawed, which it appears to be.