They see like this all the time.

  • 0 Posts
  • 51 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 2nd, 2021

help-circle
  • That’s because it’s a stupid idea blurted out by a senile old man who’s just remember things talked about decades ago by other Presidents. He remembered the star wars program under Regan and here we go. At most it’s a bullshit front to pump money into more nukes to aim at China. As if they ever needed to justify that before.

    Either that or it’s gonna be an excuse to point nukes at their own cities. Which I would t be surprised of either. If something ever comes about that jeopardizes their rule, I can see them burning it all down rather than losing control. It makes sense honestly. The more time passes the more their strategy seems to shift from winning against outside forces and more about losing in a way that keeps their power at home.






  • Not perhaps to plans of being ready for a war next year or 2028 but eventually and next decade likely.

    Simply put, I doubt this is possible. Pentagon reports a decade ago admitted that by 2025 China’s military production will reach a point where the US will never be able to catch up and compete. China’s ship building alone is what, something like 200+ times that of the US now? If it takes them a decade to “decouple” to “be ready for war” it will just end up being nuclear because a conventional war will be impossible for the west to win.









  • I think it’s easier to design maglevs to be more aerodynamic but also the lack of needing wheels at all is a big deal. Basically high speed rails are far more efficient at lower speeds but require far more energy at high speeds specifically because of the limitations of wheels and friction based propulsion.

    Maglevs are far less efficient at low speeds due to the energy requirements of the magnetic levitation, but at high speeds beat out the rails because they just glide over the tracks and are propelled by fucking magic and no moving parts.

    This is how I understand it. Deepseek told me. lol


  • Neverminded having 5 fully operable digits, which even humans really only need when playing musical instruments

    I’m sorry but wtf are you smoking? Lol. Almost all use of human tools needs 5 digits to work effectively. That why the most advanced prosthetic hands and arms are designed to mimic 5 digit hands. Sure there are disabled people that make due but the vast majority of tasks are so drastically easier with 5 functioning digits. Primarily because those tasks, tools, etc, were created with the use of 5 digits in mind. I’m sorry but this statement is absolutely ludicrous at its base foundation. It literally breaks my brain that someone would think this in any way. As someone who does woodworking, painting, cooking, and a bunch of other hobbies that involve manual use of your hands… I just can’t even. Lol. I can’t imagine doing 1/10th of what I do without thumbs and I don’t even play a musical instrument.