• 1 Post
  • 106 Comments
Joined 19 days ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2026

help-circle

















  • Blows my mind how a highly educated judge, and two lawyers, and all the other impartial educated people in the room wouldn’t be able to come to logical conclusions about these things. The problem is that the law was designed to protect the innocent but it also protects the guilty! I’ll mention OJ Simpson & Casey Anthony again. Their lawyers found every loophole available to manipulate the system in their clients’ favor. The only innocent people who end up on death row are the ones who don’t have highly-paid, highly-dedicated lawyers to prove their innocence. If guilty people can be proven “innocent,” then truly innocent people should easily be proven innocent too! If they have a lawyer who gives a damn.




  • Exactly how do you propose we do that,

    Because that’s the entire purpose of the criminal Justice system, having an impartial judge and 12 people and lawyers to work it out and figure it out, you would think all those people could come to the right conclusion!

    What maddens me is that the criminal justice system considers inadmissible as evidence, not allowed to use our instinctive skills like body language reading, intuitively knowing when someone’s lying or telling the truth, instincts, etc to contribute to coming to conclusions. In my opinion muddles the whole system because they need evidence and then you get people like OJ Simpson’s & Casey Anthony’s lawyers who literally let them get away with murder, lawyers find all these legal loopholes to let these people literally get away with murder and something really needs to be fixed. Intuition and common sense need to be allowed in the courtroom.

    Please forgive my poor sentence structure, but you get the gist of what I’m saying.