Oh no, not the economy!

It can be free, but people creating a distro can ask for money. Mostly it’s free tho, and you probably can enter a custom amount of 0.

There was this news report about a french scientist being denied entry to USA, because they critiqued the science budget cuts. While not arrested or something, it’s still telling.

“Even more news” general news and politics

“Trash taste” anime and japanese centric by 3 people who moved to Japan and are YouTubers

I love this. Even more so that there are two intertwined.

In comparison to the 20 documented ones

I have been using Uranus moons for all my devices.

For that to be on the boring dystopia subreddit is pretty funny ngl

Its a bit frustrating, as I didnt see any answer and couldnt clarify.

Yeah, that was the intention. but I guess it didnt fly.

What a bad fix.

if it doesn’t have that then it’s entirely speculation.

You are very close

It has some kind of Threads, but those don’t work for normal chats. It’s a different kind of chat. Not a great solution by teams imo

Awesome album

I know one.

I do remember the oracle vs Google lawsuit.

Google’s copying of the Java SE API, which included only those lines of code that were needed to allow programmers to put their accrued talents to work in a new and transformative program, was a fair use of that material as a matter of law. Federal Circuit reversed.

From the wikipedia article about it

A description of the decision to choose the words is contained within the video. 1:05:18

I see that the context is a different one and i also understand formal logic (contrary to what the other comment on my post says)

It’s just that if the topic is pi, I find it potentially confusing (and not necessary) to construct a different example which is based on pi (pi in binary and interpreted as base 10) in order to show something, because one might associate this with the original statement.

While this is faulty logic to do so, why not just use an example which doesn’t use pi at all in order to eliminate any potential.

I did realize now that part of my post could be Interpreted in a way, that I did follow this faulty logic -> I didn’t

Is the 1.0010101 just another sequence with similar properties? And this sequence with similar properties just behaves differently than pi.

Others mentioned a zoo and a penguin. If you say that a zoo will contain a penguin, and then take one that doesn’t, then obviously it will not contain a penguin. If you take a sequence that only consists of 0 and 1 and it doesn’t contain a 2, then it obviously won’t.

But I find the example confusing to take pi, transform it and then say “yeah, this transformed pi doesn’t have it anymore, so obviously pi doesn’t” If I take all the 2s out of pi, then it will obviously not contain any 2 anymore, but it will also not be really be pi anymore, but just another sequence of infinite length and non repeating.

So, while it is true that the two properties do not necessarily lead to this behavior. The example of transforming pi to something is more confusing than helping.

It’s a theorem. It’s theoretical. This is like complaining about the 20 watermelon example being unrealistic: that’s not what it is about.