The problem for Iran is that
At best, you might have a back and forth of missle exchanges between Turkey and Israel that the imperialist bloc works to de-escalate (just like it did with Iran last year)
Letting the US make the first strike against the EU or Canada (by acting on their annexation fantasies) would certainly be the correct option. The Chinese strategy here is correct to try to pry the EU away from the US.
However, why would this apply to Iran? What greater level of aggression does Israel have to display before the middle eastern comprador states somehow decide to side with Iran against the west?
In fact, the comprador states going to war with Iran to defend Israel would be a catastrophic error for them on a political level. It would be the PR equivalent of the EU deciding to help Russia in their campaign against Ukraine.
Furthermore, the US is actively gearing up to go to war with Iran, which places a severe time constraint on this strategy.
Trump is not reviving economic planning or industrial policy with his tariffs. Just because the US needed to re-industrialise, and just because protectionism would have been part of any re-industrialisation policy does not mean that Trump’s policy is not phenomenally short sighted.
The simple fact is that without imposition of
It is practically impossible for the US to re-industrialise. And each of these policies is critical because
If the US wanted to, they could go into Iranian airspace
The US should learn how to win against geurellas in the third world before trying to fight against actual militaries.
People use it to make fun of edgelords by posting them with this image. Although I’ve never heard anyone make fun of the image itself.
Firstly, America is not nazi Germany 2.0, nazi Germany was America 2.0.
Secondly, Who will declare war on America?
China? They already are preparing for WW3 scenarios and Trump’s statements do nothing to change the timeline of preparations
Russia? They are already at (proxy) war with the US
Iran or North korea? They have enough defensive capabilities to have a good chance of defeating a US invasion (which appears to be a matter of when not if). But no real offensive capabilities against the US (discounting US satelites).
India or NATO minus the US? Their ideological conviction would lead them to siding with American fascism rather than against it. Like, why would they invade the heartland of world-historical fascism when they themselves are fascist?
We just gonna sit around and let Nazi Germany 2.0 happen?
Modern america doesn’t a tenth the (relative to the rest of the world) military or economic power that Nazi Germany did. And that’s because other countries haven’t been sitting on their asses all this time. They’ve been struggling for decades to create the multipolar world.
call me, we can talk, I am lonely too
We can chat via text. I can barely handle calls with people I know.
Sixth 5 year plan completed
illuminating inequality
vote socialist
What the hell has this fictional “CPA” been doing for 30 years if inequality still needs to be illuminated and elections need to be fought 
Inside and outside the White House, advisers say Trump is unbowed even as the world reels from the biggest increase in trade hostilities in a century. They say Trump is unperturbed by negative headlines or criticism from foreign leaders.
Therein lies the appeal of Trump
Numerous more sophisticated approaches were developed than the one Trump selected, people familiar with the matter said.
Would mind sharing them?
The White House demanded that Britain and India change their health and sanitation rules to make it easier to export U.S. agricultural products.
Worry not, the nurglites are in control. Bird flu for everyone.
In Brazil, India and Europe, they targeted digital regulations that have entangled U.S. tech giants.
God I hope the EU doesn’t use this as an excuse to scrap privacy laws (like they keep trying with chat control).
White House spokesman Kush Desai said Trump had assembled “the best and brightest economic team in modern history” to develop the tariff plan.
The best and brightest of mainstream economists? Wouldn’t be surprised if this was actually true, given how dumb economists are.
That’s true, but I don’t think settlers are considered civilians under international law either way
Tariffs and tax cuts are basically the only 2 things in which trump actually believes.
Funniest possible outcome. The Germans found out it was stolen, try to get it back, fail, then agree agree for the money to be spent on Ukraine as a compensation. The money is never spent on Ukraine.
Maybe it could be possible. I’ll have to look into it.
No, I don’t know what I’d do with them.
Actually maybe I could use them to compute some things but that’d be a different investigation entirely.
Thanks! 
It’s the matlab operator for transposing a matrix or vector
I’m going to be real. Arguing about a hyperbolic statement is not something I have the time or energy to do. I’ll simply retract my statement and disengage. And honestly, I should also be logging off social media for a while.