• @CanadaPlus
    link
    English
    1
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Usually what’s happened in the past is that new jobs become economical. If every possible job is replaced then that’s the new territory.

    I’m highly, highly skeptical this robot doesn’t suck, though. They say it won’t fully replace their workers, and I suspect that’s because it’s going to get stuck around a tricky corner or tangled in a loose pieces of packing tape constantly.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      Then instead of a warehouse full of people, Amazon will end up with a warehouse full of robots, and a few robot babysitters.

      • @CanadaPlus
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Best case, yes exactly. But again, that’s happened before many times though (once upon a time, there was no conveyor belts or cranes in a warehouse either, there was guys doing that work) so I’m not too worried. Worst case it just fails.

          • @CanadaPlus
            link
            English
            27 months ago

            Okay, modern agriculture then. Before industrialisation, 98% of people worked in agriculture as basically peasants. Now it’s pretty much exactly the opposite, with 2% working in something related.

            I agree AI could be a major problem if it gets even a little bit better. This specific story isn’t an example though.