• Gentryfried@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    They didn’t rape any teenagers. This is just how royalty worka, obviously their uncle the king will still look out for them.

    One of you say they’re spongers because they’re married; the royal family has multiple properties and plots of land, so it’s basically like providing your nieces with one of your spare homes for when they’re visiting the country (one of them is married to an italian man i think?).

    It’s Logical.

    • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      They didn’t do anything to earn it either…why the hell should a pedophile be allowed to steal money from everyone else to keep his family living in luxury forever?

      • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        There is no evidence to suggest that Charles III is a paedophile. If you need to lie and slander to support your argument, you don’t have one to begin with.

        • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’re Andrews daughters, no one mentioned Charles. But also fuck that whole family, they all should have been executed a long time ago.

          • rose56@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Bro chill the fuck out, because the King had the balls to kick him out! What USA did for it’s pedophiles? Did they kicked anyone out? Did they arrest them?
            We should have executed Trump and it’s friends long time ago then.

            • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              37 minutes ago

              Not because he was a pedophile, because the family has been stealing and pillaging from the rest of humanity for generations. And yeah, trump and all the other billionaires can join them as far as I’m concerned.

      • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Is it tax money, or money he was paid then he is paying out?

        I mean its a technical difference and I am not really defending anything, I just don’t know how it works really.

        • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          The King owns land called the crown estate. He surrenders the profit to the treasury who then pays him back a small fraction of, which he also pays tax on.

          The King does not get funded by tax money, just a small portion of what his family’s land makes.

    • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      You mean only entitlement can pass by bloodline and not consequences of crime? Yeah, totally makes sense.

    • IanM42@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Probably because most people thought they’d suffered the same fate as him, and were reduced to being mere mortals.

      But yes they are still royals. And another reason to consign the royal family to history.

      • makingrain@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m with you there. Time to get rid of the largest benefit scroungers around.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          As one of the largest land-owners, I’m surprised they’re ‘benefit scroungers’. Did someone tell you they’re dole kings?

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            They are welfare queens, just like Walmart and McDonald’s are some of the biggest welfare queens on this side of the pond. They didn’t buy that land. They didn’t farm it. They just “own” it mostly for no real reason.

          • makingrain@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Did someone tell you that they worked hard to be land owners? Did you believe them?

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Meh. I’m fine with having a royal family - sure there’s a bunch of spongers but the fundamental principle of having a bunch of pomp and pageantry for the sake of tradition and jolly flag waving (as opposed to “get rid of the immigrants” flag waving) is fun and worth the price of entry. The price of entry pays rent for a bunch of people who did nothing to deserve it, because that’s kind of how it works.

  • Tenebris Nox@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nothing to see here… move along, please, move along… LOOK AT THOSE WORKSHY DISABLED ON PIP BENEFITS OVER THERE!

  • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    There is a formula to make out the level of rents staff have to pay to either the Crown Estate or the royal Household because they have to live on the estate.

    It works out as equivalent to 16.7% of their gross pensionable salary.

    What the fuck??? That’s for staff, not working royals, so the guy who used to iron Andrew’s shoelaces had to pay 1/6 of his pre-tax salaries in rent to live somewhere he didn’t choose.

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Tbf they did choose. They dont have to work there and are free to leave. A lot of people pay 1/3rd of their income in rent, so 1/6th is honestly a pretty good deal IMO

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean, yeah, they chose the job, but I’m assuming they can be reassigned and have to move if their boss moves. I’m sure there’s a long list of applicants, even knowing that, but it’s still kind of fucked up, especially considering that their boss definitely has enough money to pay for each of their employees’ rent, but they don’t. I guess I expected the work conditions to be better (like, some of the best in the commonwealth), but I don’t know why.

  • IanM42@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Make them pay their rent or get out. Besides I thought they were married?

    Spongers, the lot of them.

    • ladel@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think the King is paying for them with his personal money, but it is weird.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The family pulls in a LOT of rent-money. I bet they don’t need to pay much rent themselves on family land.