• Schmoo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Science is just the method by which technological advancements are achieved, it doesn’t decide the priorities. That privilege falls to capital, and by extension, capitalists.

    • theonyltruemupf@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      First and foremost, priorities are set by reality.

      Extending a dog’s lifespan by 60 years would be a very high demand product and could be sold for much more than what smartphones cost. If it was feasible, it would have already been done.

      • Shareni@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Flying would be a very high demand service and could be sold for much more than what a train ticket costs. If it was feasible, it would have already been done.

        • someone 150 years ago
    • zerakith@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I appreciate you are setting up a sort of platonic ideal of what science is but I think its important to deal with the real people and processes that science is performed by and we would be doing ourselves a disservice if we fail to acknowledge how those people and processes have often worked hand in hand with capitalist and colonial projects. We need to be introspective about how those choices have influenced the science (and the methods!) that’s been done. We, as scientists, engineers and science appreciators need to do this work so we can make different and better choices.

    • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That killed my childhood cat. Would be awesome for future kids to not experience what I did.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I dunno accepting death as an inevitability seems important since since we otherwise struggle hard to ignore it in western culture and by extension can create a lot of suffering.

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              A pet doesn’t need to die for that. If you look around… Death is everywhere!

              [Starts singing and dancing a musical number down the street]

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Accepting death is an important part of growing up, but no animal deserves to die just to be a goddamn teachable moment

    • Drusas@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would be amazing. They can already live so long. To think, you might be able to have a cat with you for most of your adult life.

    • nicky7@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m literally having my 19 year old cat put down tomorrow due to kidney disease and I very much wish for him to feel young and healthy again. It sucks.

    • freijon@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unpopular opinion: There are already way too many domestic cats and they are responsible for the extinction of various species, mostly birds. They are amongst the most problematic invasive species in the world. Its probably not a good idea to increase their lifespan…

    • DeviantOvary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of my family cats is currently at the end of her life due to kidney disease. It really sucks, glad they’re doing something about it. Now if only they could do the same for dogs.

  • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who stop at 60? Immortal dogs!

    This is your father’s dog. An elegant puppy for a more civilised age. Take care of it, you and your descendents, for it will outlive you all.

    Oh wait, now I realised that’s basically r2d2

    • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think I prefer that my dog dies before I do. Being a King Charles spaniel it’ll probably just sit by my rotting corpse until it dies from hunger.

        • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          R2, stop licking the lightsabers, you’ll get a hairball!

          R2! Hold still while I give you this oil bath! Oh no, he’s run off to the desert again to find Old Ben.

          “Captain! All the other droids died, but this little one fixed the ship and saved us!” “Be careful in the future though, it says 8 out of 9 lives left.”

          R2D2 is a cat.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They sure are!

      But humans (there is a dig line too actually) are complicated, furst treatments are out aleeady (works not very well, on only on 2 of the 7 base topics IIRC).

      Next 10 years will be interesting.