• RewindAgainOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a shame they can’t move it to a higher orbit & leave it there for future generations. People a century or two from now will be curious about the earliest days of humans in space.

    • CJOtheReal@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would fall down eventually and may hit some city or populated area, there is a option to shoot it to the moon but that’s super expensive and needs lots of engineering.

      • CanadaPlus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Depends how far they boost it up. Once it’s in MEO instead of LEO decay is less of a problem, and there would be ample time to achieve further boosts. For example the GPS satellites will take millenia to move considerably closer to earth.

        The article actually mentions the idea, but apparently it’s bound to physically fall apart after a while, and it’s a big thing that could make a lot of debris. I guess you could put it in a net, but I’m not sure how cool a bundle of scrap that used to be the ISS is. The smart folks at NASA seem sure there’s no point.

        • CJOtheReal@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah the ISS gets hit by space debris form time to time and they need to do very frequent maintenance to not let it fall apart

  • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It would be better to save a few sections as a museum and dismantle and recycle the rest of the materials in space.

    We will eventually need to build space ships in orbit, so why not harvest the precious metals and such in orbit? It is currently very expensive to take materials off planet. The metals could be reused eventually and reforged into something else.

    • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You need manufacturing capabilities in orbit before you can “recycle” things, and that’s way off. It’s still more effective to build things on earth and bring them into orbit because we can’t actually build anything in space yet.

        • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I love your enthusiasm and hope.

          I too wish we could develop orbital manufacturing systems. I think the problem with the ISS is just that it’s way too old in terms of electronic hardware. I can’t imagine what kinds of computers are running the station given that it was built during the time that we were still working with 32 bit computers by and large.

          Ironically enough China is the closest to being able to do orbital manufacturing. They have their own space station (we don’t like to talk about it in the Anglo-sphere) that they built entirely on their own that’s more modern than the ISS. They launch more rockets than we do and have more concrete plans for Lunar colonization than most of the Western powers. I really wish we would take this seriously and re-enter a new age of the space race. China is kicking our asses up and down low earth orbit.