• bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I don’t see how vertical farming can make sense. There is only so much sunlight striking the ground and you just changed the angle and so shaded something else.

      • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        Let’s assume the energy for lighting comes from solar. Panels are only 20% effective. Nor your vertical farm needs 5x the space than a basic farm, and you still have to pay for it instead of using free sunlight. There is some video on YouTube from some professor who works for nasa on growing plants in space about this topic.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Sure, but where does the energy for that light come from? If the answer is burning things (this is the most likely answer today!) then you are making the world worse. Renewable answers all go back to the sun so why not use the sun directly and avoid all the inefficiencies from turning the sun into electric and then back into light? Which leaves nuclear - which is dieing because of expense.

        • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Photosynthesis only uses a couple frequencies. Using solar to generate electricity and feed that into target LEDs can be significantly more efficient.