Stanford RegLab, Princeton, and the County of Santa Clara Collaborate to Use AI to Identify and Map Racial Covenants from over 5 Million Deed Records
hai.stanford.edu
The approach paves the way for faster and more accurate compliance with California’s anti-discrimination law.
  • LughOPMAEnglish
    2·
    1 month ago

    false negatives

    I don’t get your logic here either. A false negative would have zero implications for anyone. It would have no legal standing or relevance.

    • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.comEnglish
      4·
      1 month ago

      A false negative would, as I’m understanding the goal here, be a case where the AI missed an existing problem.

      It wouldn’t change the current state so it wouldn’t actively hurt anything though, and of course it’s plenty likely a human checker would have overlooked those misses and more.

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.socialEnglish
      4·
      1 month ago

      A false negative would have zero implications for anyone. It would have no legal standing or relevance.

      I don’t understand, in what way does allowing a racist deed covenant stand unchallenged have zero implications or relevance?

      If it did, then what would be the point of rooting them out in the first place?