• psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Could you add a link to anything about that? Not that I’m disbelieving, mostly I want to know how

      • stinky@redlemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        From https://steemit.com/chemistry/@pinkspectre/sugar-sabotage

        When you add water to dry concrete mix, it reacts with chemical components of the cement - calcium, silicon and aluminum oxides - to form a paste which thickens around the aggregate, binding it together as the mixture hardens. Without this hydration reaction, the concrete can’t properly bind and remains soupy. Sugar molecules interfere with this process, possibly by preventing the particles in the cement from clumping. However, there may be a more chemistry-based explanation. Aluminum and calcium can react with sugar to form insoluble chemical complexes, meaning they cannot be readily dissolved in water

        Apparently, refined white sugar works best, while lactose has only minor effects. Setting can be increasingly delayed by adding more sugar, up to 1% of the cement volume. After this, the concrete will not harden at all! I learned about this from a facebook-circulating antifa post, with the intent of getting activists to use sugar to sabotage a border wall

        • stinky@redlemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Companies building plants of this size are likely to have law enforcement or private security protecting the build operation. It would be illegal and dangerous to go anywhere near that site with white sugar while concrete trucks are turning.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            You can edit your earlier comments, it’s not necessary to reply to yourself

            • stinky@redlemmy.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I do it out of courtesy when the follow-up comment is not strictly related, so that it can be folded away by readers

  • stinky@redlemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The article cites a corporate document which lists a large number of proposed plants:

    LNG Projects:

    Guyana

    Start-up: 2025 to 2027

    Brazil (Bacalhau Phase 1)

    Start-up: 2025

    Papua

    Start-up: 2025

    Rovuma Phase 1

    Start-up: 2025 and beyond

    Product Solutions:

    China Chemical Complex

    Start-up: 2025

    Fawley Hydrofiner

    Start-up: 2025

    Singapore Resid Upgrade

    Start-up: 2025

    Strathcona Renewable Diesel

    Start-up: 2025

    Advanced Recycling

    Start-up: 2025-2027

    U.S. Gulf Coast Asset Reconfiguration

    Start-up: 2028-2030

    Next Renewable Fuels

    Start-up: 2028-2030

    Specialty Products:

    Proxxima™ Thermoset Resins

    Start-up: 2025-2030

    Advanced Coke for Battery Anode Materials (Carbon Materials)

    Start-up: 2028-2030

    Low Carbon Solutions:

    Donaldsonville, Louisiana (CF Industries)

    Start-up: 2025

    Convent, Louisiana (Nucor Steel)

    Start-up: 2026

    Beaumont, Texas (Linde)

    Start-up: 2026

    Gillis, Louisiana (New Generation Gas Gathering - NG3)

    Start-up: 2026

    Yazoo City, Mississippi (CF Industries)

    Start-up: 2028

    Baytown, Texas (Blue Hydrogen)

    Start-up: 2029

    Lafayette County, Arkansas (Lithium Deep Brine Direct Lithium Extraction)

    Start-up: 2028

    Summary:

    ExxonMobil is expanding its operations across Guyana, Brazil, Papua, Rovuma, China, Singapore, the U.S. Gulf Coast (Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, Arkansas), and Beaumont with new plants expected to start up between 2025 and 2030.