• bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not really because humans are expensive and so only the rich can afford them. My kids get half an hour a week of music tutoring and it costs me time toeget them there plus the cost of the teacher. An ai could be at all practice times as well for when there is a teaching moment.

    • Neuromancer49@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Unfortunately, I don’t think we’re close to getting an AI music tutor. From a practical standpoint, a large language model can’t interpret music.

      From an ethos standpoint, allowing AI to train a musician breaks my heart.

      • jollyroberts@jolly-piefed.jomandoa.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I could see a world where an AI teaches the mechanics of music, but is not relied on for evaluation of the students imagination in applying the mechanics.

        When I was in art classes I wanted the class to teach me the techniques I did not know, but I was usually disappointed.

        Like my life drawing classes would be me drawing images, and then getting judged on /what I already knew how to do/.

        What I felt I would have benefited from was more along the lines of “here is three different shading techniques and how they can be used” or “here are three ways to use oil acrylic | water color paints you’ve not used before.”

        I always had ideas of images to create, what I could have benefited from was intros to more tools and ways to use those tools.

        I could see an AI being able to do that for students of the arts.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That is a good - but different - point.

        Though a large part of tutoring music is just “play that again” said in a way that the music is played again.