• greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I live in a pretty mountainous area, but I can think of a couple blind corners on small hills near me. So probably the one on the way to the bakery while running or biking.

    But I do a lot of ski touring so I’d rather die on one of the big ones.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Anyone who puts always-on blue LEDs in electronics deserve the oubliette. People who put such LEDs in electronics meant for the bedroom deserve an oubliette that’a slowly filling with water.

    • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Or just excessively bright LEDs. Just because LEDs are super efficient, doesn’t mean they should take them as bright as they can go.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Allow me to try and persuade you. The problem is bright blue LEDs. It’s still stupid that they make them so bright, but the problem isn’t the color. A hypothetical bright red, green, or amber LED would also be a problem.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        This is fair. I have had to put tape over a red alarm clock because it was too bright before. Those manufacturers also get the oubliette

      • deathbird@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Shorter wavelengths hit different though. That’s why we have blue light filtering glasses, Redshift, etc.

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Are you for or against it? I mean, it does have it’s uses.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        For it. Its lack of use in a union contract was a factor in a court ruling some years back. That’s when it went from pedantry to real-world consequence for me. Something was ruled similar to A and B rather than A or B.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Fuck yeah.

      Also missing from sub-clauses, at least in America, is the trailing delimiter comma.

      • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Took me a minute of googling to be vaguely sure you meant what I think you mean: the comma marking the end of your dependant interjectory clause there?

        at least in America**,**

        If so: I have no idea what you are talking about, that’s drilled into us in school. Maybe people get lazy on the Internet but it is part of the rules and gets taught and used here

        If I’ve misunderstood: what are you talking about, then?

  • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There absolutely was a cornucopia in the fruit of the loom logo. That is the sole reason I know what a cornucopia is. It wasn’t on any table or in any thanksgiving decoration in my childhood, it isn’t a popular thing to exist in media, it was an obscure item that was a main part of an underwear logo.

    Anyone that says differently is objectively wrong. I don’t know why the logo changed and why besides a patent entry even the company itself denies it. I don’t really care if this is an alternate earth or aliens or time travellers or an entirely natural quirk of existing in a quantum universe, but I know for an absolute fact the sole reason I know what a cornucopia is is because of my underwear, and not because my dick is coincidentally called the horn of plenty.

      • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Yeah, snopes isn’t a trustworthy source, and more importantly, there absolutely was. I know that for an absolute certainty, and gaslighting isnt going to work.

    • GoldenQuetzal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I remember this as well, just like I remember Mandela dying in prison. Felt like I was Looney Tunes when I found out as an adult he was still alive.

      • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Nobody thought Mandela died in prison. He was one of the most high-profile people in the world in the 1990s, constantly in the papers after his release from prison. How could you believe he died in prison?

          • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            But then how could he have been released to huge fanfare and shaken up politics?

            Do these people believe Narendra Modi died in 2009? It just doesn’t fit major world events.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Most people aren’t really familiar with the history of the world, especially the period of time that would correspond to ≈ 30-50 years before they graduated secondary school. I assume this is because there seems to be a pattern where you just don’t actually catch up to current events in many history classes.

              Also expecting the average person in the US to be familiar enough with world events to even know who Nelson Mandala or Narendra Modi are, is a good way to have a bad time. I don’t like it either, but as Carlin said, “think of the average person, now remember that 50% of people are stupider than that.”

              • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Maybe the real Mandela effect is we were all tricked into thinking there are people out there believing Nelson Mandela died before leading the ANC, being president, winning the Nobel, and ending apartheid.

    • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Denying that the logo used to have a cornucopia is a thing? Sheesh, TIL.

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Appliances and cars should never have an internet connection for any reason.

    Also fuck touch screens give me buttons.

  • Salamander@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The split between “Today” and “Tomorrow” is at midnight, not when one sleeps/wakes up.

    This comes up often after midnight when my girlfriend asks me about “tomorrow”. Why discuss breakfast for tomorrow when we still haven’t had breakfast today??

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      If someone says “last night” when talking at 12:01AM, do you consider them to be talking about 1 minute ago?

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Must disagree. If today ended at midnight, then my streak of watching at least one episode of a TV show every single day would have been broken years ago. No, today ends when I go to sleep, even if it’s at noon on what is your tomorrow

    • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Some computer nerd friends and I came up with a solution for this:

      Computer architectures typically provide separate instructions for “logical” and “arithmetic” bit-shifts. The details as to why aren’t important, but we can borrow the nomenclature.

      When referring to “tomorrow” in the sense of “when I wake up from my next sleep cycle”, use “logical tomorrow”. When referring to “tomorrow” in the sense of “after midnight tonight”, use “arithmetic tomorrow” (or “chronological tomorrow”, if you really want to be pedantic).

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You may want to ask a member of the cult of the subgenius the difference between “real” midnight and “conspiracy” midnight.

  • addiks@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Using tabs for document management (f.e. Browsers, Text-Editors, …) was a mistake. It would be way better if every document (website, text-file, image, console, …) was in its own window, centrally managed by an intelligent window manager of the OS that allows quick and easy search between all documents like with a full-text searchable exposè-like view.

    Using tabs for document-management was a bad but necessary workaround because Windows is a horrible window manager (despite its name, ironically).

    Tabs work best when there is a fixed amount of them (Like with game settings: Controls, Audio, Video, Gameplay).

    I could go on for quite a while on this, but I think this is where I stop.

  • Astrophage@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It is NOT “habañero.” If you pronounce a “y” in the word, you’re commiting what’s called a “hyper-foreignism” where you over apply something you learned a foreign culture does.

    It’s just an N sound. Habanero.

    It’s not even my culture/language but damn this gets under my collar.

    • zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I have never heard someone say “habañero”, that’s hilarious. I live like 20 miles from the Mexico border though so most people speak at least a little Spanish.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I think part of the problem is that it’s hit or miss whether or not it’s spelled/spoken with ñ or n, in advertising and labels. Here in the US anyway.

      What’s funny is that the ñ spelling and pronunciation has bled over into native spanish speakers. My friend’s husband is from Nicaragua, and his entire family pronounces it ñ. One of my neighbors though, from Guadalajara originally, it’s n only.

      I’d also say that habanero is ñ friendly. It looks like it should be pronounced habañero, unlike a fairly similar word, Enero. It’s easier to say habañero than eñero as well. The a leading into the n does that for some reason I can’t figure out.

      However! Pero and perro blows people’s minds. While I don’t hear it with native speakers, damn near everyone else I’ve run into pronounces them the same. I do, and I know better, because I can’t make my tongue work right.

      • Astrophage@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That is how languages grow and change: by the native speakers collectively changing their minds. I’ll leave them to be the gate keepers. I feel strongly because I knew a family from a El Salvador that lived down the street from me growing up. They corrected me and I did not want to be wrong in front of them again. I wanted them to feel accepted. I still do.