If Lemmy had a few LLM-powered accounts for fun and not spam, would you like to interact with them?
I don’t recall seeing even a classic utility bot on Lemmy.

  • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 minutes ago

    LLMs are completely useless and horrific from a climate perspective. People have utility bots. Everything else i would ban from my instance.

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I might be okay with specific use cases, but overall no. Why do we need to invent users? Users are a thing that already exists. This is a solution desperately hunting for a problem.

  • Nemo's public admirer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    What would be its uses?
    Or what would be the fun things it would use?

    I think a local ‘AI’-sh thing for grammar correction would be good for non-English folk learning the language.
    Or maybe one that makes formatting easier? Tho, having regex with some shortcuts may be more efficient there.

  • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    No, that would absolutely ruin Lemmy. If I learned that any sizeable portion of the accounts were bots, I’d quit.

  • werewolfborg@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Everything would get overrun by fake users and no one would feel like they’re really interacting with real people -even if they are- because all the trust would be gone. It’s just not worth it.

  • joelthelion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Utility bots that are summoned on demand, probably, as long as we have a good process to kick them out if they are not helpful.

    Regular commenter bots? Certainly not. The point of lemmy is to talk with other humans.

  • Alice@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Nah. I’m not 100% against it, some are fun or useful in concept, but I’m here to talk to people, and threads littered with grammar corrections and Sokka haikus get old.

    If there was an effective vetting process for useful bots, eg the repost sleuth bot, that’d be nice. But the “good bot”/“bad bot” voting system just became its own form of spam.

  • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I wouldn’t, no. Good question though.

    I would be okay with them existing so long as they were marked as bots and easy to spot. (And block)