• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s all to grift investors and CEOs who surrounded themselves with yes men get the same news as investors.

    We literally can’t get it with silicon chips, because silicon is a solid.

    I was literally just watching some videos with a panel of the world leading physicists in this.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdzXbIW9kxY

    None of these tech bros understand what consciousness is, they’re operating on way out of date oversimplified explanations and assuming there’s nothing deeper.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The hope is that we don’t actually need consciousness to produce something useful. And ultimately, that would be for the best. If we know definitively that silicon computing cannot result in consciousness, then many of the ethical concerns of using AIs disappear. You still have the ethical concerns of replacing human labor and using stolen work to train them, but at least you don’t have to worry about creating a slave race in the process.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nobody understands what consciousness is - nor is that even relevant here. Artificial Super Intelligence that isn’t conscious is a perfectly coherent concept. While it’s valid to discuss whether a system like that could be conscious, there’s absolutely no reason to assume it needs to be.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Artificial Super Intelligence that isn’t conscious is a perfectly coherent concept.

        Yes…

        If you don’t know what youre talking about. It’s sounds plausible…