• Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    A human christian women let their newborn baby to die in the forest while her and her family fucked off to an impromptu trip. The baby was only found thanks to the dog barking and trying to bring attention to it.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If the first statement were true then Adam and Eve did not sin because they literally did not know right from wrong until eating the literal fruit of the knowledge of food and evil.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They literally didn’t exist. It’s a story made up by people to scare children.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s a weird story though because the moral seems to be that even adults don’t do what they’re told. And sometimes your sister is hot.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        They literally did not know what they were doing was evil because they literally did not know right from wrong.

      • Glytch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yes, but they didn’t understand that not following God’s orders was bad. They weren’t capable of making moral decisions because they hadn’t eaten the fruit yet.

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          If you follow the story, it’s apparent that the end was engineered. And that the real villain was not the snake or adam nor eve but god itself

  • taxiiiii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    22 hours ago

    cat: stares intently at the growling human while slowly pushing the mug off the table

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Cat: I’m bored. Let’s see if I can get the hairless ape 20x my size off the couch. Ooh! I bet they can’t get over here before this hits the ground.

      :: gently pawing ceramic figurine sounds ::

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      After years of training to know what the word ‘No’ command means.

    • the_q@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      This isn’t right or wrong; it’s a guaranteed reaction.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Yeah it’s bullshit. Pro-social animals like dogs, primates, elephants understand group norms and social expectations e.g. appeasement behaviour. Its probably how our own “morality” developed as a species.

    And there’s evidence to suggest some species like dolphins absolutely do exhibit moral type behaviour like fairness and cooperation.

    • the_q@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Your examples, and honestly calling it bullshit, operate under your human understanding of right and wrong.

  • bampop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Right and wrong is one thing, sin is another. Sin is doing stuff that God says not to do, morality doesn’t really come into it. Cats can’t sin because they don’t have theistic religion.

    • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Defying an authority figure is not a sin. What if it tells you to do something bad, like slit your sons throat and burn the body? Defining sin as questioning authority is BS.

      • bampop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        That is precisely what differentiates sin from evil. It’s why we have two words for those two things. Abraham would not have sinned by killing Isaac as ordered. But it would have been an evil act, and stupid and insane

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Cats are their own gods. Letting them see the bottom of their food bowl is a mortal sin and you will burn in kitty hell for it.

    • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Evil is a human definition. I’m sure there have been tigers/bears/sharks/hippies that have gone on killing sprees that have been defined by humans as evil, though they were working well within their own natural framework of aggression.

      *I meant hippoes, not hippies, but the statement stands.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Homo Sapiens, subfamiliy homininae, suborder Haplorhini, is a animal too.

      Btw, chimpanzee wage war and crows bully in groups.