• nuachtan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    7 days ago

    We’ve known this for decades, but almost no districts will make the changes necessary. The youngest grades (K-4 or 5) should be the first schools to start in the morning, and the HS the last.

    What happens when that is suggested is people balk at either sports programs needing to be cut or the argument that the older siblings need to be out of school to babysit the younger siblings.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yep, exactly.

      Almost 30 years now we’ve known that shifting around the school schedule by roughly a max of 2 hours would result in significantly improved learning across the board, for basically 0 cost… and we don’t do it.

      America is a scam.

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        School is conditioning for work. They need you sleep-deprived because if you have any extra energy you might use it to analyze your situation and attempt to improve it.

    • 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      well modern public schools are basically glorified daycares.

      awful start time policies being the norm never changes despite the massive mountain of evidence it should because parents typically need to go into work in the morning. society collectively decided shafting kids’ sleep schedules by starting school before the already absurdly early 9-5 was the best we could do on that compromise.

      and to an extent, that’s true, because we’d have to reform a lot more than just schools to effectively implement this change. there just isn’t the will in the public sphere to push this.