• Ben Matthews@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 年前

    At 1000 km/hr, it’d run out of track in less than four minutes, hope it can stop in time … Anyway not convinced there’s much point in this. China should be building more suburban rail networks to fill the gaps, instead of pouring so much concrete into crazy-wide highways and toll-roads (look on satellite image, you’ll see).

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 年前

        Except the concept is already “proven” in that regard. What the issues are with it, are the same as with everything techy that needs to make it in the world - scaling it up.

        It’s impossible to hold a vacuum in a tube that’s hundreds of kilometers long. It is impossible to build a vacuum tube that doesn’t suffer because of thermal expansion. It is impossible to build that long of a tube and it not have a single dent in it across the entire way. Even if you somehow ignore physics, people don’t need a train like this. There is flights. Travelling at reasonable speed has been proven for hundreds of years.

        To explain it in a tldr way, I can grab a straw, put a wet tissue inside it, blow on it and in relative speeds it would go incredibly fast. Yet nobody would go for trying that with a train, since scaling it is impossible.

        • wahming@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 年前

          Science isn’t just theory. Actually building stuff teaches us a lot of things, and there isn’t really any other way to advance fields like materials science without hands on experiments