“Even in that simplified, proof-of-concept drone, the printed battery achieves a 50 percent boost in energy density, and uses 35 percent more available volume.”

Interesting idea, though no word on cost. I doubt they could compete with the economies of scale lithium-ion batteries benefit from. Then again, it isn’t always about being the cheapest. The world is full of hundreds of thousands of different models of machines that might benefit from this. Some people will happily pay extra to get a 50% boost in capacity.

Material’s Printed Batteries Put Power in Every Nook and Cranny

  • TunaLobster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Not exactly. They are increasing energy density. So for the same mass they are providing more mAh. More charge. Equal weight. Equal motor. Equal consumption. Longer flight time.

    This doesn’t really impact sUAS because they are already using pocket cells. Larger things that use jellyrolls, but need a better packing factor or would benefit from not carrying around all of those capsules and button tops are the target here