• just2look@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      So its not entirely just a stereotype. They have done studies on it, and it holds remarkably true. I’ll see if I can find one of them for you.

      Edited to add a link to the study: Homophobia study

        • just2look@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It says there is a correlation between homophobia and sexual arousal from homosexual visual stimulus. I’m not sure what you mean?

          • CXORA@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It does not say “most homophobes are gay”.

            Which is the topic of the thread.

      • Bonson@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Thank you for citing sources, remarkable that there is statistically an interaction. I wonder what other common phenomena people may be in denial about?

      • Allonzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Exactly.

        It’s not accusing the being gay of fucking them up, it’s accusing the unhealthy repression.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        Gay people in denial are still gay though. If they weren’t, they wouldn’t be in denial

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Not closeted people, just those in denial. If you’re in the closet, that means you’re scared of coming out, whereas someone who’s in denial has some unhealthy reason to want to not be gay that leads them to hate that part of themselves.

          • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 days ago

            ahh, so much better

            How about we just attack homophobic people for being homophobic, instead of using gay as an insult in a roundabout way of calling them a hypocrite?

            • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              As a queer person I never understood this

              They are not being attacked for being gay. They are specifically attacked for being homophobic.

              TERFS are also not being attacked for being women, nor is attacking TERFS an attack against all women either.

              Attacking someone who’s bi or homosexual in denial and overcompensating that with hatred says absolutely nothing about gay people as a whole, or implies in any way that being gay is problematic.

              And to be completely honest here, it feels kinda presumptuous the way this is being argued. Almost like it shouldn’t be allowed to criticise someone gay for any reason at all. Queer people are a very diverse group of people and obviously we have assholes, too. It’s not doing anyone a favor if we act like that’s impossible.

              • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                They are specifically attacked for being homophobic.

                No, they are attacked for (assumingly) being gay

                • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Maybe you and I are having different conversations then. I’ve never experienced it being taken this way.

                  • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I’ve never experienced it being taken this way

                    But you have, that’s what the entire discussion is about.

            • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I just wish there was a clean way to diss them for weaponising their self-hatred. If you think of a really pithy insult for people who externalise their negative feelings, please share with the rest of us, it’s badly needed.

              • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                weaponising their self-hatred

                But it’s also just regular hatred, same reason you can’t call racist people the N word.

                Even if there was a slur for hypocrites, that’s still just an ad hominem instead of attacking them for their behavior (the actual problem)

                • stray@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  But if there were a slur for hypocrites that word would by definition be attacking them for their behavior since hypocrisy is a behavioral choice and not an element of personal identity.

                  I’ve actually heard “coon” from a black leftist to refer to black conservatives who try to protect themselves by being “one of the good ones” in the eyes of right-wing racists. The term isn’t something I’m comfortable using myself as a white person, but I don’t think it’s problematic or racist because it’s directed at their harmful behavior and not their skin color.

    • stray@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not blaming homosexuals in general; it’s blaming specifically those homosexuals who help uphold systems of oppression. It’s the same as women who uphold sexism or pickme minorities. They’re using the oppression of others as a shield against their own oppression instead of joining the fight for equality.