Assuming what you’re describing works (and i have no particular reason to doubt, beyond the generally poor reputation of AI), that’s a different beast than “lol i fired all the copywriters, artists, and support staff so I, the owner, could keep more profits for myself!”. Or, “I didn’t pay attention in English 101 and don’t know how to write, so I’ll have expensive auto suggest do it for me”
Yeah that’s my point. AI has a lot of problems that need to be addressed, put people are getting so mad about AI that conversation around it is getting more and more extreme to the point people are talking about all AI being bad.
I think what was being implied though was that the original poster was saying that any use or talk of AI by a company immediately invalidates it, regardless of there being any specific traits like firing workers present. (e.g. “Using AI” was the only prerequisite they mentioned)
So it seems like, based on the original wording, if they saw a hospital going “we use top of the line AI to identify tumors and respiratory diseases early” they would just disregard that hospital entirely, without actually caring how the AI works, is implemented, or affects the employment of the other people working there, even though it’s wholly beneficial.
Or the original poster was going by what is commonly referred to as AI today and not the multi-generational tree of technologies that fall under the academic definition of AI.
Assuming what you’re describing works (and i have no particular reason to doubt, beyond the generally poor reputation of AI), that’s a different beast than “lol i fired all the copywriters, artists, and support staff so I, the owner, could keep more profits for myself!”. Or, “I didn’t pay attention in English 101 and don’t know how to write, so I’ll have expensive auto suggest do it for me”
Yeah that’s my point. AI has a lot of problems that need to be addressed, put people are getting so mad about AI that conversation around it is getting more and more extreme to the point people are talking about all AI being bad.
I think what was being implied though was that the original poster was saying that any use or talk of AI by a company immediately invalidates it, regardless of there being any specific traits like firing workers present. (e.g. “Using AI” was the only prerequisite they mentioned)
So it seems like, based on the original wording, if they saw a hospital going “we use top of the line AI to identify tumors and respiratory diseases early” they would just disregard that hospital entirely, without actually caring how the AI works, is implemented, or affects the employment of the other people working there, even though it’s wholly beneficial.
At least, that’s just my reading of it though.
Or the original poster was going by what is commonly referred to as AI today and not the multi-generational tree of technologies that fall under the academic definition of AI.
Register is a thing.