• Tailz (she/her)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is me but with Shawshank Redemption. I get what it was trying to go for but I just didn’t vibe with it. I can appreciate the fact that so many people saw something in it that I didn’t. To me it was decent but by no means one of the best films ever

  • Meltdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Any of those boring-ass superhero movies. What is so appealing about hour-long GCI fight scenes and no plot?

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think they just forgot the lessons from the earlier movies. They had action but there was a lot of build up so it meant something.

      Now you’re just straight into a boring fight scene with no stakes. And somehow the bigger the stakes the less there are because you know they can’t fail.

      And now even the rare consequences can be undone through time travel and multiverse bullshit.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s the whole thing with Infinity War, they failed hard and that made it a wild story.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          I think they fucked up having Endgame the year after infinity War. Should have left it five years or so, and had things happening in between. I feel we missed out on a gritty R-rated, Punisher style, Hawkeye there. It should have had consequences that were left to feel for a bit, rather than instantly going “magic bullshit go” and reversing it all.

          But they fucked that by having Spidey get dusted, so they had to bring it back quick otherwise how would they explain how Tom Holland had gone from looking about 14 to being a man.

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            I do agree we missed a bit of ronin Hawkeye action, and such. They don’t really have an interest in comitting to going that dark.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      The colors! it’s so many. Plus there is a plot it’s just not very deep like in a comic book. The whole source material like 20 pages. It’s not novels.

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        This is very true, but id like to point out its a us comic thing. I’d invite you to read european comics, belgian ones in specific.
        The thorgal series, aria, joko tsuno, or hell even the suske & wiske reboot called amoras. They are teen/adult comics that are a lot darker and more flushed out story wise than us hero comics

        • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          I will check those out thank you. We have some more advanced ones here as well they just don’t seem to make movies about it unfortunately.

          • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Thats sad because some real adult/darker themed comics that dont follow the superhero theme are real gems. Got some us recommendations?

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Never forget the golden rule: DC;RtRR, or

      Disregard capeshit; rewatch The Raid Redemption

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I thought Black Panther was mid at best but it made me sound like a racist whenever I mentioned that.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ironically, this movie is pretty racist. The opening scene is a cliche basketball scene, and Wakanda, despite being a futuristic society, still uses tribal law and decides its leaders by fighting half naked to the death.

      • Jhuskindle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        I mean I’m confident they were to fight have naked due to eye candy. That 100% worked on me despite the bland writing.

      • dmention7@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Aquaman

        I agree with you in general, but I don’t think you can pin this one on the dudes… or at least not the ones below 3 on the Kinsey scale 😆

  • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Anything from Quentin Tarantino, his writing style just bugs the fuck out of me, he is so far up his own ass and it shows with every stupid pretentious monologue.

    So much sound and fury, signifying nothing.

  • tarknassus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    Everything Everywhere All At Once. I found it utterly boring, yet everyone seemd to love it, especially my fellow ADHD crowd. I never even bothered finishing the film which is bloody rare for me.

    Yet I like mind-bending films like Primer, and chaotic films like Crank, and heck, I even like Battleship as a guilty pleasure that I can turn my brain off to… But this film? Bleh.

    • moakley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      I felt mostly the same way watching it, but I also think the ending of the movie is important to understand the soul of it. I wasn’t crazy about the humor or the whole look-how-random-LOL vibe it had, but I do think there was something more beneath that. The performances were also very good.

    • acidbattery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is the exact film I came to comment. It tried way too hard to be quirky and rAnDoM.

      • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I liked it, but a lot of it seemed like reddit fan fiction. What if butt plug fight. Imagine they have carrots… Not saussages as fingers. Someone give this man gold.

    • 1c5473@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I didn’t get the hype when I watched it the first time shortly after it was released. But when I rewatched it recently it hit differently. There was less need to try to keep up with all the random things that are happening so fast and instead I focused on the deeper message about the meaning of and the appreciation for our lives with all the good and bad going on.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    When you find mediocrity unacceptable, popular shit doesn’t usually suit your palate. This isn’t a bug, it’s a feature.

  • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Everyone around me said i should watch Napoleon Dynamite because it was sooooo funny. It was just an autistic kid doing and saying cringey things.

    I also hate Donnie darko, Requiem for a dream, 90 % of David Lynch (especially Mulholland drive), citizen Kain, etc. Too many to mention.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Eternal sunshine of a spotless mind. I walked away thinking wow that was boring and I really hate Jim carry.

  • Marty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The Deadpool Movies, just don’t get them for some reason.

    Feel like there’s no real plot, nothing really matters, the humor is family guy level cameos and 4th wall breaks that are only funny when used sparingly.

    It’s like eating an Oreo but we took out the cookie so now you’re just OD’ing on stuffing and not in a good way.

    • Jhuskindle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      The “humor” is just Ryan being Ryan. He is a mean guy. It’s funny on screen but IRL he is just that rude and gross to everyone without discrimination. I had to work with him twice and I dislike him. His wife is the same way. They are just objectively cruel for no reason. Which is funny when you’re acting on screen only.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Deadpool the character is an asshole, so it makes sense he’d be good at playing him.

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Strangely enough there aren’t that many movies that feature jets dogfighting though. That kind of makes it worth watching because I love Ace Combat and that’s the closest thing I’ll probably ever have to a feature film.

    • Doubletake2121@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Same. I mean, it wasn’t a bad movie, but I didn’t walk out of the movie theater and think about it a lot after, either. Even though it’s supposed to be a movie you think about. I like all sorts of foreign films, so it’s not that.

    • CyanideShotInjection@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      This and The Joker are the two movies that come to mind when this type of question comes up. Inception is not particularly bad, just so… correct. I was expecting something really mindbinding, that would make me rethink about it long after the movie was over. It was just a pretty scenery with mid acting. No amount of practical effect can carry a movie on his own. The Joker on the other hand was just a waste of my time and left me infuriated.

    • GCanuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      This one for me too. I watched after hearing all the hype, and I just thought it was subpar at best and actively bad at worst.

      I figured it was because those who hyped it had never been exposed to the ideas in the movie and thought it was special. While my old ass had seen these ideas hashed and rehashed a dozen times over the years.

      It felt like a new Brat Pack phoning in a pay check.

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        It was the whole time in dreams goes by exactly 10 times faster than reality that lost me on that one.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        This is why I consume zero hype for any movie. Ive ruined so many movies by having a set of expectations going in.

  • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    Oppenheimer

    And even to an extent interstellar

    I just find recent Nolan massively overrated

    Which is ironic because The Prestige, Memento and even Dunkirk are great

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I both loved and hated Interstellar. Really loved the storytelling and visuals, really hated how sci-fi/magical it got towards the end

      I remember thinking at the end “wait, what was the entire point of this?”

    • JordanZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think he plays with the timelines of some of his movies a bit too much to the point it’s just a chore to sort it all out. At the end of Oppenheimer I’m just like…great, now I need to watch this again. It still made sense but going back with the context of oh that scene is like years prior to the one we just watched…and that one goes after this other one.

      I still need to watch Dunkirk again because I honestly think the theater spliced a reel in the wrong spot. I was back at my parents for some reason that summer and saw it with them and some of my siblings…everybody was a little lost. So I’m withholding judgement on that till I see it again.

      Interstellar was at least more or less linear just with time acceleration.

      I haven’t even seen Tenet yet but from what I’ve heard…

      Prestige and Memento(oddly enough) I don’t have an issue with…

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Interstellar was at least more or less linear just with time acceleration.

        Except the library bit. If I stop Interstellar before the ending then I can enjoy it.

      • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Tenet is just laughably bad from an audio but also writing POV.

        Cool concept tho. He just managed to ruin it.

        I’d still recommend you watch it just for those two things.

        • JordanZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Dunkirk was a weird exception

          Warner Bros. is looking to make the most of it. The studio has announced that theaters in the U.S. and Canada will be showing Dunkirk in all its glory in 125 locations around the country, the widest 70-mm release in 25 years. To make that happen, the movie will be shown in 30 IMAX theaters that are equipped with 70-mm projectors. In addition, 95 old 70-mm projectors, once thought to be a technology destined for obsolescence, have been resuscitated and installed in select theaters.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Oppenheimer

      YES. For me it was especially disappointing because I’m exactly the target market for this kind of film on every level.

      • Fuck spez@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        The thing that gets me is that it was simultaneously way too long while also finding a way to be too short. Obviously years of history have to be compressed to fit into three hours of cinema, but they distilled what was originally months worth of conversation down to one or two lines of dialog in some cases. It’s more off-putting to me than a two-hour film would have been if they had just skipped some of the details.

        I wish they had just taken some creative license and done what the writers of the miniseries Chernobyl did with the fictional Ulana character:

    • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I liked Oppenheimer because I found the man compelling, plus the cinematography and pace really complimented the drama of his life in a way that kept me engaged. I think one’s enjoyment of the movie really comes down to if they find the decisions he made interesting or dramatic enough to be worth watching for 3 hours. If you find that boring then there’s nothing really there to enjoy.

      • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think it was the most useless movie to watch/record in IMAX. The trinity test was visually extremely disappointing (Nolan’s fault for not wanting to use CGI and rely on practical effects to mimick a nuclear explosion was just stupid…) and also Oppie as a character in the movie is extremely bland and shallow

        And finally once again the only relevant female character is laughably bad.

        IMO from barbenheimmer, Barbie was the best movie or at least the one I’d more easily rewatch

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Beyond the Barbenheimer memes, everyone pretty much forgot that movie existed after a few weeks.

  • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    I find it helps to avoid the hype trains surrounding new media releases, as well as anything after the teaser trailer.

    Getting one’s expectations up usually results in the said media failing to live up.

    Best to go in blind and make your own mind up afterwards!